2014
DOI: 10.9790/0661-16537987
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of blood samples for counting leukemia cells using Support vector machine and nearest neighbour

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They are able to achieve 92% accuracy. Chatap et al 23 deployed global thresholding using Otsu threshold technique for segmentation of lymphocytes. After extracting shape-based features, k nearest neighbor classifier was trained to achieve an accuracy of 93%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are able to achieve 92% accuracy. Chatap et al 23 deployed global thresholding using Otsu threshold technique for segmentation of lymphocytes. After extracting shape-based features, k nearest neighbor classifier was trained to achieve an accuracy of 93%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This algorithm constructs a line between highest histogram value of the image and lowest histogram value through which an optimal threshold value is calculated and image is segmented based on that threshold value [ 45 ]. For acute lymphoblastic leukaemia detection, Otsu's thresholding [ 16 , 21 ] method performs better and provides 93% overall accuracy as compared to Zack's algorithm [ 17 , 29 ] that is able to achieve 92% results.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several machine learning-based computer-aided ALL diagnosis methods have been presented over the last few years (Mohapatra et al, 2011;Madhukar et al, 2012;Joshi et al, 2013;Putzu et al, 2014;Mohapatra et al, 2014;Chatap & Shibu, 2014;Neoh et al, 2015;Reta et al, 2015;Vincent et al, 2015;Patel & Mishra, 2015;Kazemi et al, 2015;Amin et al, 2016a,b;Singhal & Singh, 2016;Rawat et al, 2017a,b;Mishra et al, 2017;Karthikeyan & Poornima, 2017;Mishra et al, 2019). All these methods utilize a predefined set of features based on the structure of the nucleus or cytoplasm of the cells to train classifiers such as naïve Bayes, decision tree, support vector machine (SVM), random forest, and the ensemble of classifiers for the diagnosis of ALL.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%