2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.06.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of case-cohort data: A comparison of different methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
99
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
4
99
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At time of event, these case subjects had the same weight as the subcohort members and only then contributed to the risk sets. Results from a case-cohort study closely resemble analyses on a full cohort (29). All models were adjusted for sex, age, and cohort (model 1).…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…At time of event, these case subjects had the same weight as the subcohort members and only then contributed to the risk sets. Results from a case-cohort study closely resemble analyses on a full cohort (29). All models were adjusted for sex, age, and cohort (model 1).…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Differences were examined using mean and SD for continuous variables, with p values from an ANOVA test or using number and per cent for categorical variables, with χ 2 test. Multivariable Prentice-weighted Cox-regression was used, allowing for the nested case-cohort design [21,22], to examine associations between total 25(OH)D (quartiles) and incident diabetes. ≥50 nmol/l) groups in a multivariable-adjusted model that included the covariates specified in model 5 above.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach provides association estimates that resemble those from full-cohort analysis, in particular when the sampling fraction is Ն10%. 13 Baseline characteristics of the subcohort were examined by ␣-Adducin genotype. Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) was tested with the 2 exact test (the expected count under the HWE was less than 5 for 1 of the 3 genotypes among the controls).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%