2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00417-019-04497-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of corneal stromal roughness after iFS 150 kHz and LenSx femtosecond LASIK flap creation in porcine eyes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The surface roughness can be measured with various techniques, such as optical microscopy and scanning electronic microscopy [5,6]; notably, atomic force microscopy (AFM) obtains objective measurements with high resolution on the nanometric scale [1,7]. Atomic force microscopy topographic surface measurements have been previously used in ophthalmology for corneal [8] and IOL surface roughness studies [1,9,10], but there have been no previous studies on the surface roughness of phakic IOLs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surface roughness can be measured with various techniques, such as optical microscopy and scanning electronic microscopy [5,6]; notably, atomic force microscopy (AFM) obtains objective measurements with high resolution on the nanometric scale [1,7]. Atomic force microscopy topographic surface measurements have been previously used in ophthalmology for corneal [8] and IOL surface roughness studies [1,9,10], but there have been no previous studies on the surface roughness of phakic IOLs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2. In the past, many other studies also used porcine corneas to evaluate the stromal surface [ 7 , 30 , 31 ]. 3.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our group recently reported [ 10 ] lower RMS values after LASIK flap creation with LenSx compared with IntraLase iFS150 kHz. Compared to that data, VisuMax obtained the smoothest corneal stromal beds (lower RMS values).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%