2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2003.11.083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of cyanobacterial toxins by hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
103
0
4

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 159 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
103
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…To be consistent with previous research [25,26], we considered that analogs with the sulfate group located at C-11 in α-position were the first to elute, and those with the sulfate group in β-position eluted later, as shown in the tables, but we did not confirm this elution pattern. Table 5: GC toxins identified in F2 (20% MeOH) by HILIC-MS/MS analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 35%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To be consistent with previous research [25,26], we considered that analogs with the sulfate group located at C-11 in α-position were the first to elute, and those with the sulfate group in β-position eluted later, as shown in the tables, but we did not confirm this elution pattern. Table 5: GC toxins identified in F2 (20% MeOH) by HILIC-MS/MS analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 35%
“…These analogs contain the same substituent (hydroxyl or sulfate group, or both), but at different sites, e.g., hydroxyl group on N-1 or on the benzoyl ring and sulfate groups on C-11 or on the benzoyl ring. Nevertheless, we considered that the molecules with the sulfate group in α-position were the first to elute, as mentioned by Diener [25] and Dell' Aversano [26]. In such cases, structural identification must be supported by NMR, or at least by analysis of the molecular fragments obtained by tandem mass spectrometry, such as those reported by Vale [20].…”
Section: Polarity Of Gc Toxins and Chromatographic Aspects Of Retentimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) was carried out using a Waters Acquity HILIC (1.7 µm particle size, 2.1 × 50 mm) column kept at 30°C. The injection volume was 7 µl and the linear gradient scheme was: t0 80% A, t5 20% A, t6 = 80% A, t7 = 80% A; A and B were 0.05 M ammonium formate in water and pure methanol, respectively (Dell'Aversano et al 2004). The total run time was 7 minutes and the flow rate 0.25 ml min -1 .…”
Section: Cyanotoxins Extraction and Lc-ms Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An additional aliquot was analyzed following the use of solid phase extraction (SPE) for clean-up of the lyophilized sample. Samples were eluted using both a normal phase/hydrophilic interactive column (ANTX-A) and a C18 reverse phase column (CYN) coupled with a mobile phase of water, acetonitrile, formic acid, and ammonium acetate (Aversano et al 2004). Run times were 10 and 15 min for ANTX-A and CYN, respectively.…”
Section: Anatoxin-a and Cylindrospermopsinmentioning
confidence: 99%