2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2019.102067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of dietary habits in a prehistoric coastal population from İkiztepe, North Turkey, using stable isotopes of Carbon, Nitrogen, and sulphur

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, we found differences among individuals that share the same set of available resources given their geographical location (Figure 6), particularly for South Mendoza and Southwest forest where there is evidence of higher human density during the Middle‐Late Holocene than in the North Neuquén (Cobos et al, 2022), as well as more diversity of species available for human consumption (Figure 1b). Although inter‐individual variation has been widely covered by examples in ecology (e.g., Araújo et al, 2011; Bolnick et al, 2003) and in the archaeology of complex, resource‐producing societies (e.g., Irvine & Erdal, 2020; Kinaston et al, 2013; Kusaka et al, 2010), it remains less explored in hunter‐gatherer bioarchaeology, and virtually unexplored in Northwest Patagonia. In these last cases, the analysis of diet variation in the literature implicitly assumes that individuals within populations had equal access to all resources consumed by the populations in these areas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we found differences among individuals that share the same set of available resources given their geographical location (Figure 6), particularly for South Mendoza and Southwest forest where there is evidence of higher human density during the Middle‐Late Holocene than in the North Neuquén (Cobos et al, 2022), as well as more diversity of species available for human consumption (Figure 1b). Although inter‐individual variation has been widely covered by examples in ecology (e.g., Araújo et al, 2011; Bolnick et al, 2003) and in the archaeology of complex, resource‐producing societies (e.g., Irvine & Erdal, 2020; Kinaston et al, 2013; Kusaka et al, 2010), it remains less explored in hunter‐gatherer bioarchaeology, and virtually unexplored in Northwest Patagonia. In these last cases, the analysis of diet variation in the literature implicitly assumes that individuals within populations had equal access to all resources consumed by the populations in these areas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, this trend continued into the Chalcolithic period and Bronze age (ca. 2200 cal BC) (Pickard et al, 2016;Styring et al, 2017;Irvine and Erdal, 2020; Table 3). These findings are similar to those at Bronze Age sites in the Balkans, where agriculture spread from the Near East (Vaughan et al, 2013).…”
Section: Isotopic Compositions In Pigs In the Prehistoric Near East I...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides the remains of terrestrial animals, a large number of fish vertebra were also found at the settlement (Alkım et al, 2003). However, the stable isotope analyses have determined that marine and/or aquatic resources were either not consumed by the _ Ikiztepe people, or in small amounts, or very irregularly (Irvine et al, 2019;Irvine & Erdal, 2020a). The archeobotanical data indicate that the most ubiquitous grain was emmer wheat followed by einkorn and bread wheat and barley.…”
Section: Carbohydrate Versus Protein Intakementioning
confidence: 99%