1994
DOI: 10.1007/bf01571056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of electrophoretic whole-cell protein profiles as a tool for characterization ofEnterococcus species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
0
2

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
43
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The classification of the genus Enterococcus has undergone considerable changes as a consequence of the increase in the number of novel species and also improvements in the methods used to discriminate separate species (Baele et al, 2000;Merquior et al, 1994;Naser et al, 2005). At the time of writing, 34 Enterococcus species names have been validly published (Euzéby, 1997; last full update May 14, 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classification of the genus Enterococcus has undergone considerable changes as a consequence of the increase in the number of novel species and also improvements in the methods used to discriminate separate species (Baele et al, 2000;Merquior et al, 1994;Naser et al, 2005). At the time of writing, 34 Enterococcus species names have been validly published (Euzéby, 1997; last full update May 14, 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extract preparation and whole-cell protein profile analysis using one-dimensional SDS-PAGE were performed as described previously (Merquior et al, 1994). Dice indexes were determined for each isolate by using the Molecular Analyst Fingerprint Plus Software Package Version 1.6 (Bio-Rad) and a dendrogram was constructed by using the UPGMA algorithm.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysis of purified 221 preparations was carried out by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) [12]. After electrophoresis, gels were either silver stained [13] or bioassayed by a modification of the method of [14].…”
Section: Sds-page and Bioassaymentioning
confidence: 99%