2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.05.079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of factors influencing bone ingrowth into three-dimensional printed porous metal scaffolds: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
126
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 234 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 130 publications
1
126
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[135,136] For years, researchers aimed to improve this process, as poor bone ingrowth may have led to implant loosening, necessitating revision surgery. [137] The vast majority of such experiments were focused mainly on the modification of the surface of dense biomaterials such as roughness and bioactivity.…”
Section: Osseointegration Of Porous Implantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[135,136] For years, researchers aimed to improve this process, as poor bone ingrowth may have led to implant loosening, necessitating revision surgery. [137] The vast majority of such experiments were focused mainly on the modification of the surface of dense biomaterials such as roughness and bioactivity.…”
Section: Osseointegration Of Porous Implantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[139] A study by Nadezdhin et al showed an ectopic osteogenesis test which proved better osteogenic and osteoconductive characteristics of porous implants in comparison to the uniform surface configuration of low roughness. [137] In a recent study, Chang et al evaluated titanium scaffolds for bone defect restoration. [137] In a recent study, Chang et al evaluated titanium scaffolds for bone defect restoration.…”
Section: Osseointegration Of Porous Implantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A large number of investigations are therefore concerned with the implementation of implant surfaces with biocompatible or bioactive properties [17][18][19][20]. The aim is to establish conditions that will optimally assist bone in growing in order to achieve maximum secondary stability [21][22][23][24][25].Numerical simulations are also frequently used in the area of implant development as an indispensable link between constructive development ideas and experimental testing [26][27][28][29][30]. The success of an implantation is determined not only by secondary stiffness but also by primary anchoring strength [29,31,32].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large number of investigations are therefore concerned with the implementation of implant surfaces with biocompatible or bioactive properties [17][18][19][20]. The aim is to establish conditions that will optimally assist bone in growing in order to achieve maximum secondary stability [21][22][23][24][25].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%