2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11739-020-02521-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of fatal adverse drug events recorded in several Italian emergency departments (the MEREAFaPS study)

Abstract: La pubblicazione è resa disponibile sotto le norme e i termini della licenza di deposito, secondo quanto stabilito dalla Policy per l'accesso aperto dell'Università degli Studi di Firenze (https://www.sba.unifi.it/upload/policy-oa-2016-1.pdf)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is a post hoc analysis performed on pharmacovigilance reports of suspected AE collected between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2018 in the EDs participating to the MEREAFaPS Study [ 9 , 45 , 46 , 47 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a post hoc analysis performed on pharmacovigilance reports of suspected AE collected between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2018 in the EDs participating to the MEREAFaPS Study [ 9 , 45 , 46 , 47 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a post-hoc analysis performed on pharmacovigilance reports of suspected AE collected between January 1 st , 2007 and December 31 st , 2018 in the EDs participating to the MEREAFaPS Study [9,[45][46][47].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, pharmacovigilance studies, performed with an “active” approach by trained healthcare professionals, can provide detailed information about hypersensitivity ADEs and their diagnosis, especially when these studies are performed in a hospital setting (i.e., ED) [ 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 ]. This way, “active” pharmacovigilance studies may represent one of the best epidemiological strategies to fill the above-mentioned major limitations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%