2020
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0518
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of floodplain forest sensitivity to drought

Abstract: Floodplain forests are very complex, productive ecosystems, capable of storing huge amounts of soil carbon. With the increasing occurrence of extreme events, they are today among the most threatened ecosystems. Our study's main goal was to assess the productivity of a floodplain forest located at Lanžhot in the Czech Republic from two perspectives: carbon uptake (using an eddy covariance method) and stem radius variations (using dendrometers). We aimed to determine which conditions allow for high ecosystem pro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
37
1
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
37
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As in previous extreme summers, the productivity of crops and grasslands was more strongly affected by the summer drought in 2018 than forests exposed to the effects of both high soil moisture deficits and high water vapour pressure deficits [33,[47][48][49], even though some forests also registered stomatal closure and reduced GPP, especially those at lower altitudes [48] and more exposed to drought [44]. Wetlands in Scandinavia were also negatively affected by the drought [50], but floodplains in the Czech Republic registered higher than average productivity [43]. The geographical distribution of the negative versus positive impacts on ecosystems' GPP and net ecosystem productivity (NEP) can therefore be partly explained by the dominance of croplands in the southern sector of the drought region (Germany, The Netherlands and Belgium, Poland, southern Sweden), compared with the forest-dominated regions in the higher latitudes.…”
Section: Ecological Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As in previous extreme summers, the productivity of crops and grasslands was more strongly affected by the summer drought in 2018 than forests exposed to the effects of both high soil moisture deficits and high water vapour pressure deficits [33,[47][48][49], even though some forests also registered stomatal closure and reduced GPP, especially those at lower altitudes [48] and more exposed to drought [44]. Wetlands in Scandinavia were also negatively affected by the drought [50], but floodplains in the Czech Republic registered higher than average productivity [43]. The geographical distribution of the negative versus positive impacts on ecosystems' GPP and net ecosystem productivity (NEP) can therefore be partly explained by the dominance of croplands in the southern sector of the drought region (Germany, The Netherlands and Belgium, Poland, southern Sweden), compared with the forest-dominated regions in the higher latitudes.…”
Section: Ecological Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, in humid climates, increased incoming solar radiation during meteorological drought periods can even enhance evapotranspiration [35] often leading to positive anomalies in vegetation indices, relative to the mean conditions, despite relatively dry conditions [36][37][38][39], as illustrated in Figure 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Above the so-called critical moisture content, evapotranspiration and plant functioning will not be limited or affected by a lack of precipitation. In fact, increased incoming solar radiation during drought periods can even enhance evapotranspiration (Teuling et al, 2013), leading to positive anomalies in vegetation indices despite prolonged meteorological drought conditions (Jolly et al, 2005;Teuling et al, 2006;Mastrotheodoros et al, 2020;Kowalska et al, 2020). Because of this duality in the drought impacts, the use of the term agricultural drought is ambiguous, even more so as the term drought bears a negative connotation to it, though its impacts are not necessarily negative.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%