“…In addition, the data are very heterogeneous, making any comparison difficult. Several publications showed no significant difference between sham or exposed cells [Gurisik et al, 2006;Qutob et al, 2006;Whitehead et al, 2006a;Chauhan et al, 2007;Huang et al, 2008], or described weak changes that were not confirmed by RT-PCR validation [Zeng et al, 2006;Paparini et al, 2008;Roux et al, 2011;Sakurai et al, 2011], while other microarray studies reported modified gene expression after radiofrequency exposure [Belyaev et al, 2006;Nylund and Leszczynski, 2006;Remondini et al, 2006;Zhao et al, 2007;Huang et al, 2008]. However, these positive studies reported a small number of responsive genes (9-34) with a FC generally close to, or lower than 2.…”