2004
DOI: 10.1038/nrc1393
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of genomic targets reveals complex functions of MYC

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
242
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 271 publications
(248 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
4
242
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…WS5, a direct transcriptional target of Myc F Reiter et al be identified and analysed. This is a considerable challenge since key transcriptional regulators like Myc, involved in the control of many fundamental biological processes, affect the expression of many genes (Neiman et al, 2001;Menssen and Hermeking, 2002;Patel et al, 2004). However, not all of these genes are necessarily effectors of the biological functions of Myc (Grandori et al, 2000;Eisenman, 2001).…”
Section: Ws5 a Direct Transcriptional Target Of Myc F Reiter Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…WS5, a direct transcriptional target of Myc F Reiter et al be identified and analysed. This is a considerable challenge since key transcriptional regulators like Myc, involved in the control of many fundamental biological processes, affect the expression of many genes (Neiman et al, 2001;Menssen and Hermeking, 2002;Patel et al, 2004). However, not all of these genes are necessarily effectors of the biological functions of Myc (Grandori et al, 2000;Eisenman, 2001).…”
Section: Ws5 a Direct Transcriptional Target Of Myc F Reiter Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For validation of a direct target, binding of Myc in vivo and tight correlation of transcriptional alterations with Myc expression is required (Eisenman, 2001). Several direct Myc targets have been well defined (Dang, 1999;Grandori et al, 2000;Hermeking et al, 2000;Eisenman, 2001;Patel et al, 2004), most of them with biological functions in cell cycle control, metabolism or ribosome biogenesis, but only a few have so far been directly linked to the transforming function of Myc (Eisenman, 2001, Patel et al, 2004. These include the ornithine decarboxylase gene (ODC), the tumor-associated membrane glycoprotein gene Tmp, the metastasis-associated protein 1 (MTA1) gene, or the transferrin receptor 1 (TFRC1) gene, that were shown to have oncogenic potential (BenPorath et al, 1999;Eisenman, 2001;Zhang et al, 2005;O'Donnell et al, 2006).…”
Section: Ws5 a Direct Transcriptional Target Of Myc F Reiter Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Myc is isolated from nuclei in heterodimers with Max and binds to DNA at CACGTG and related sequences. Comprehensive analysis of Mycregulated transcription reveals that in a whole range of cell lineages, Myc activates and represses an approximately equivalent number of genes (Patel et al, 2004;. When Myc binds to its consensus sites, it recruits cofactors such as TRRAP and Skp2, which mediate transactivation .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been reported that enolase-α also plays an important role in the regulation of c-myc promoter activity in the form of alternative translation product MBP-1 (37-40 kDa), which is distinct from its role as a glycolytic enzyme [59][60][61][62]. The c-myc proto-oncogene is known as an essential part of normal cell proliferative machinery [63,64]. MPB-1, structurally very similar to enolase-α, binds to the c-myc P2 promoter and down-regulates c-myc expression, and therefore, suppresses cell proliferation [60][61][62].…”
Section: Cooperation Of Npm and Enolase-α In Pbrmentioning
confidence: 99%