2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2020.101557
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of geometrical defects in overhang fabrications in electron beam melting based on thermomechanical simulations and experimental validations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Vo et al [ 44 ] proposed an explanation based on the decreasing magnitude of thermal shrinkage during cooling of consecutive overhang layers which is constrained by the growing stiffness of the underlying structure. Ghaoui et al [ 16 ] performed a thermo-mechanical simulation to validate this model and obtained a good agreement with experimental data. The thermo-mechanical origin of the observed effect is also indirectly confirmed by the simulation performed in the current investigation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Vo et al [ 44 ] proposed an explanation based on the decreasing magnitude of thermal shrinkage during cooling of consecutive overhang layers which is constrained by the growing stiffness of the underlying structure. Ghaoui et al [ 16 ] performed a thermo-mechanical simulation to validate this model and obtained a good agreement with experimental data. The thermo-mechanical origin of the observed effect is also indirectly confirmed by the simulation performed in the current investigation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Cheng and Chou [ 13 ] applied a much more detailed FEA model to simulate the warping in overhang regions for a small number of layers [ 13 ] and the effect of an underlying support structure [ 14 , 15 ]. Ghaoui et al [ 16 ] developed a model to simulate the edge loss effect and achieved a good agreement with experimental data. In total, these more detailed simulations provided the opportunity to validate theoretical models for simple and small-scale geometries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…From the comparison results, the following outcomes could be drawn: i) The microstructure of the L-PBF and E-PBF parts were not significantly affected by the specific part geometry: this result could be expected considering the principles of the two processes, for which the laser-matter interaction is almost independent from the intended geometry. As a matter of fact, part design features such as overhanging elements, high surface to volume ratio elements (e.g., lattice structures) and very thin walled elements are considered as source of parts properties heterogeneity, the latter intended in terms of microstructure, defects, hardness and so on [35][36][37][38]. On the other hand, despite this case study included a thinwalled structure, the overall mass of the part made it less sensitive to microstructure differentiation from the axisymmetric part.…”
Section: Effects Of the Part Geometry And Anisotropymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The shrinkage usually causes loss of the lower edges of parts as illustrated in Figure 3 (the left side of the part is fixed). From several experiments led by Vo et al (2018) and Ghaoui et al (2020) it has been inferred that the shrinkage of a layer is highly dependent on the number of layers above it. In fact, every deposited layer shrinks when solidifying and cooling.…”
Section: Minimize Shape Deformation Risks (Ar5)mentioning
confidence: 99%