2015
DOI: 10.1785/0120150066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Ground Motion from An Underground Chemical Explosion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They found that a large part of the S-wave energy present in the simulations were generated by the source, whereas some scattering off of topography and shallow crustal heterogeneity was required to match the observations. Reasons for the different findings by Pitarka et al (2015) on the importance of very near-source scattering may include the different bandwidths studies (0-10 vs. 0-4 Hz here) and details of the near-source crustal model (grid spacing of 4 m with a minimum V S of 550 m=s vs. 100 m and 2500 m=s, respectively, in our study). Moreover, it should be noted that our fit between the synthetics and data, such as on the transverse component, has ample room for improvements, with delayed arrival of the largest phase at ∼140 s and overprediction of the later-arriving energy at ∼140-180 s. Although we show that the contribution from crustal and mantle scattering to the transverse-component energy arriving at regional distance can be significant, further simulations, including effects such as topographic scattering, nonisotropic sources, and nonlinearity, are clearly needed to illuminate the generation of near-source S-wave generation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They found that a large part of the S-wave energy present in the simulations were generated by the source, whereas some scattering off of topography and shallow crustal heterogeneity was required to match the observations. Reasons for the different findings by Pitarka et al (2015) on the importance of very near-source scattering may include the different bandwidths studies (0-10 vs. 0-4 Hz here) and details of the near-source crustal model (grid spacing of 4 m with a minimum V S of 550 m=s vs. 100 m and 2500 m=s, respectively, in our study). Moreover, it should be noted that our fit between the synthetics and data, such as on the transverse component, has ample room for improvements, with delayed arrival of the largest phase at ∼140 s and overprediction of the later-arriving energy at ∼140-180 s. Although we show that the contribution from crustal and mantle scattering to the transverse-component energy arriving at regional distance can be significant, further simulations, including effects such as topographic scattering, nonisotropic sources, and nonlinearity, are clearly needed to illuminate the generation of near-source S-wave generation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…For example, Takemura et al (2015) simulated wave propagation out to distances of about 70 km from explosive and earthquake sources for frequencies up to 4.2 Hz in Japan. Rodgers et al (2010) investigated topographic scattering effects, and Pitarka et al (2015) simulated the seismic signature of a chemical explosion in 3D crustal models using finite-difference (FD) methods. Wang et al (2016) showed that including topographic scattering can improve the accuracy of source location.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary scientific objective of SPE experiments is to understand the generation of S waves from a subsurface explosion. The DAG chemical explosions were recorded by an extensive suite of subsurface and surface seismic sensors (Larotonda & Townsend, 2021) in a location with extremely well‐characterized subsurface geology (Wagoner & Prothro, 2020) and seismic velocity structure (Pitarka & Mellors, 2021; Pitarka et al., 2015; Toney et al., 2019). The DAG events were the first subsurface explosions recorded by a nearby borehole fiber, although earlier explosions at the NNSS were measured using surface fiber at greater distances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SW4 and its second-order predecessor WPP (Nilsson et al, 2007;Petersson and Sjogreen, 2010) have been used for earthquake (Aagaard et al, 2008(Aagaard et al, , 2010Rodgers et al, 2008;Dreger et al, 2015;Johansen et al, 2017; and explosion ground-motion simulations (Rodgers et al, 2010;Pitarka et al, 2015;Hirakawa et al, 2016). Under a recent Volume XX, Number XX -2019 3 Department of Energy Exascale Computing Project, SW4 has been modified to improve efficiency on computers with many cores (central processing units [CPUs]) per node with a hybrid OpenMP-message passing interface (MPI) parallelization scheme.…”
Section: Sw4 Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%