2007
DOI: 10.1007/s10681-007-9528-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of hybrid lethality in F1 wheat-rye hybrid embryos

Abstract: The eVect of the Embryo lethality mutant (Eml) of rye was studied in crosses between hexaploid wheat and corresponding inbred rye line (L2). Histological analysis of hybrid embryos revealed morphological diVerences 16 days after pollination. Eml was found to arrest the formation of shoot meristem but had no inXuence on root meristem formation. The eVect of Eml cannot be overcome by in vitro embryo rescue via direct regeneration on Kruse medium. The possibility of complementary interactions between wheat and ry… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rye lines L2 (and by inference, also the genetically related lines L3 and L564), as well as the unrelated line L535, carry the allele preventing the normal development of a hybrid embryo. This gene was named by Tikhenko et al (2005Tikhenko et al ( , 2008 Eml (embryo lethality). Because we cannot determine yet, whether the allele for embryo lethality is dominant or recessive, we designate the alleles determining the production of differentiated (normal or wild-type) and undifferentiated (lethal or mutant) embryos Eml-R1a and Eml-R1b, respectively, following the rules for gene symbolization (McIntosh et al 2008).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Rye lines L2 (and by inference, also the genetically related lines L3 and L564), as well as the unrelated line L535, carry the allele preventing the normal development of a hybrid embryo. This gene was named by Tikhenko et al (2005Tikhenko et al ( , 2008 Eml (embryo lethality). Because we cannot determine yet, whether the allele for embryo lethality is dominant or recessive, we designate the alleles determining the production of differentiated (normal or wild-type) and undifferentiated (lethal or mutant) embryos Eml-R1a and Eml-R1b, respectively, following the rules for gene symbolization (McIntosh et al 2008).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hybrid seeds of all other lines were viable. The non-germinating hybrid seeds obtained from crosses with both L2 and L535 had a normal endosperm, but hybrid embryos were either absent, or varied in size from small to normal, but without any indication of tissue differentiation (Tikhenko et al 2005(Tikhenko et al , 2008. In the present paper, we describe the identification and mapping of the gene(s) responsible for the failure of these wheat × rye hybrid embryos to develop, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…For Triticum aestivum 9 Secale cereale crosses, Tikhenko et al (2008) reported that embryos at 20 DAP responded better than those at 16 DAP. Working with Cicer arietinum 9 C. bijugum hybrids, Clarke et al (2006) proposed that the ideal time for embryo rescue was at the early globular stage (2-7 DAP) of embryogenesis, because at later stages (heart-torpedo; 15-20 DAP), the hybrid embryos were aborted and the response was drastically decreased.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Embryo rescue is still being used in breeding programs for the generation of genetic variability and incorporation of desirable traits from inter-specific or inter-generic hybrids (for review see Sharma et al 1996). Embryo rescue to develop improved germplasm has been successfully used in legumes (Clarke et al 2006;Fratini and Ruiz 2006;Fratini and Ruiz 2008), cereals (Rodrangboon et al 2002;Tikhenko et al 2008), oilseed crops (Luhs and Friedt 1994;Muangprom et al 2006), horticultural crops Drew et al 2006;Yang et al 2007;Tian and Wang 2008) and many other economically important plant species. A more sophisticated approach to the creation of genetic variability was through somatic cell hybridization by fusion of protoplasts, and in the late 1970s several significant breakthroughs occurred in addition to publication of a number of reports pertaining to basic protoplast isolation and culture (for reviews see Lynch et al 1993;Waara and Glimelius 1995;Davey et al 2005;Liu et al 2005).…”
Section: Technology-based Breedingmentioning
confidence: 99%