2003
DOI: 10.1002/jssc.200301615
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of intermediates from polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon biodegradation

Abstract: A major difficulty in assessing bioremediation in hydrocarbon impacted field sites is the determination of the extent and products of contaminant biodegradation. Previously, various analytical techniques, including mass spectrometry and chromatography, have been used to characterize components in mixtures resulting from biodegradation. In this work, the applicability of capillary electrophoresis (CE) to this area of research is demonstrated. CE methods were optimized for analysis of compounds that are known me… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Upon background correction with ALS, the LODs via SPE-RTF meet the expectations for the analysis of B[a]P metabolites in urine samples[36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45].…”
mentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Upon background correction with ALS, the LODs via SPE-RTF meet the expectations for the analysis of B[a]P metabolites in urine samples[36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45].…”
mentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Analysis of metabolites has been accomplished via high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), capillary electrophoresis (CE) and gas chromatography (GC). Ultraviolet-visible absorption and RTF detection have been widely used with both HPLC and CE [40][41][42][43][44][45]. The ultimate specificity belongs to high-resolution MS either coupled to gas chromatography (GC-MS) or HPLC (HPLC-MS) [46][47][48][49][50][51].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of instrumental methods of analysis for PAHs are routinely used, including HPLC coupled with fluorescence detection, GC-MS, GC-MS/MS, and LC-MS/MS [16][17][18][19][20][21]. Although detection itself in most cases is straightforward, reliable sample preparation is not.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thereafter, the raw analyte is usually cleaned up and separated into different polarity groups, with solid‐phase extraction or column chromatography using, for example, silica gel and different solvent combinations. After extraction and clean‐up/fractionation, the analytes are quantified by HPLC/DAD or GC with flame ionization or mass spectrometric detectors (Meyer et al, 1999; Lundstedt et al, 2006a), capillary electrophoresis (Copper, 2003), and liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (Galceran and Moyano, 1996; Letzel et al, 2001; Lintelmann et al, 2006; Delhomme et al, 2008). Some problems that have been encountered in past analyses of OPAHs include low recoveries, matrix interferences, complicated and time‐consuming sample preparation steps, the high cost of analysis, a shortage of authentic reference/labeled standards, and a lack of certified reference materials (Meyer et al, 1999; Albinet et al, 2006; Lundstedt et al, 2006a; Lundstedt et al, 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%