Analysis of international legislation on non-interference in personal and family life

Abstract

Abstract. This article analyzes the basic principles of international legal acts, the Constitution of the USA and the countries ofthe European Union, regulating relations in the sphere of protection personal and family life. Due to the fact that the concept of “noninterferenceinto privacy” is relatively new to the criminal procedural legislation of Ukraine, the basics for normative legal regulationof a justified interference with privacy by state authorities while conducting criminal investigations are emphasized; their importancefor criminal investigation is paid special attention in judicial consideration along with taking into account the specifics of national le -gislation. The purpose of the article is to investigate the concept of the right to non-interference within the privacy.The study determined the peculiarities of national regulatory approaches to non-interference with private life that have developedlegislation and years of experience in protecting human rights and freedoms. This paper summarizes the international experience ofleading countries in the field of protection of personal and family life is generalized. Since the concept of “non-interference with privatelife” is relatively new to the domestic legislation of Ukraine, it is of great interest to study foreign experience of legal regulation of thisbasis of criminal proceedings. The specificity of the purpose and objectives of the study necessitated the use of dialectical, comparative-legal, historical-legal, formal-logical, system-structural, sociological, and statistical and other methods of scientific search.As a result of the research, on the basis of the analysis of international legal documents, the Constitution of Ukraine, the CriminalProcedure Code of Ukraine and the positions covered in scientific publications, special attention is paid to the urgency on observing theguarantees of non-interference with privacy in criminal proceedings, when there is a high risk of violation of rights and legitimate interestsof its participants. It is argued that restrictions on these rights are possible only in the manner guaranteed by the law and solely toachieve the objectives of criminal proceedings in order to protect the state, society and individual citizens from criminal encroachments.