The objective of the article was to analyze the problematic aspects of the judicial executive process, considering its properties and the classification of its stages. The methodological basis of the study are the general and special methods of scientific knowledge (inductive, analytical, hermeneutic, systemic and others). The results of the study include the analysis of scientific approaches to the essence, properties, classification of stages of the executive process and argumentation of theoretical proposals and informed practices. Moreover, the authors' conclusions on certain topics are set out, a new original definition of "stages of the executive process” and their original new classification is based. The practical importance of the results is that the conclusions and proposals made significantly enrich procedural science during the implementation of judicial decisions; it will be useful for the subjects of enforcement proceedings (implementing agents, parties to enforcement proceedings) in the exercise of their procedural rights and the performance of their procedural functions. The conclusions presented based on the analysis can be used to generalize executive practice.

The purpose of the article was to reveal the problematic aspects of the realization of the right to housing by war veterans who participated in counter-terrorism operations / joint operations. I am interested in observing the protection of this right in civil, criminal and executive proceedings based on national and international law. The methodological basis of the study includes general and special methods of scientific research (historical, statistical, formal logic, comparative legal and structural logic). Statistics are given on the number of war veterans (combatants) as of 2019-2020, in the dynamics of providing them a living space in Ukraine during 2015-2020. In addition, the article provides examples of the elimination of conflicts of laws and ambiguous judicial practices of application of civil, family, housing and social law, as well as civil, criminal and executive procedure in the field of exercise of the right to housing by combatants and their families, protection of this right before the courts and execution of decisions in this category of cases. The results of this work can be useful for combatants who need to improve their living conditions, as well as for human rights defenders who help these people.

У цій публікації поставлено за мету переконати опонентів в тому, що здійснюючи функцію процесуального керівництва, прокурор, серед іншого, вправі брати й особисту участь у розслідуванні, бо ж є відповідальним за його результати. І коли наявна ситуація можливої втрати доказів, знищення їх джерел тощо через зволікання у часі, то очевидною і логічною є ініціатива прокурора, котра має своїм результатом особисте провадження ним відповідних процесуальних дій у межах наданих йому повноважень. Для досягнення задекларованої мети та отримання належних результатів використано таку сукупність методів: формально-логічний, аналізу та синтезу, вибірку, порівняльно-правовий, прогнозування. Результатами такої діяльності є: 1) з’ясовано, що дати ґрунтовну відповідь на задекларовану у її назві дилему можливо лише за умови врахування тих законодавчих положень, судових позицій та тлумачень, а також авторських роздумів і концептуальних розумінь, які дозволяють сформулювати переконання у тому, що цілком закономірно та логічно, що прокурор, котрий є процесуальним керівником за КПК України, має широкі повноваження щодо проведення окремих процесуальних дій у кримінальному провадженні та всього розслідування в цілому; 2) констатовано, що внесення відомостей до ЄРДР дозволяє прокурору здійснювати свою процесуальну діяльність в межах першої стадії кримінального провадження – досудового розслідування; 3) доведено, що проводячи всі дії, передбачені частиною 2 статті 36 КПК України, та здійснюючи інші повноваження, визначені для нього КПК України, прокурор, незалежно від місця прокуратури в системі прокуратури України чи адміністративної посади, яку прокурор обіймає у прокуратурі, реалізуючи процесуальне керівництво досудовим розслідуванням, апріорі не виходить за межі наданих йому повноважень. Висновки: зазначена процесуальна діяльність прокурора водночас служить виконанню завдань кримінального провадження і переслідує мету – створення передумов для встановлення істини. Проводячи певні процесуальні дії після внесення відомостей до ЄРДР, у випадках, коли для них прокурор є належним суб’єктом, вести мову про певні хиби у сформованій ним доказовій базі, лише за ознакою неналежного суб’єкта, не доводиться.

The article is devoted to the topical issue of judicial control over non-interference in the private (personal and family) life of participants in criminal proceedings. The study was conducted in the context of the analysis of the practice of the ECHR, the legal positions of which should be consistently applied in criminal proceedings, evidence of this are the legal requirements on this issue. The notion and concept of judicial control is a necessity component that helps in guaranteeing the respect of human dignity and integrity. It is a common and established principle that, during the pre-trial process, it is the position of those ensuring justice in making sure that the life of persons is respected and safeguarded. It is noted that in accordance with the national legislation of Ukraine, judicial control is a separate function of the court's activities at the stage of pre-trial investigation, directly carried out by the investigating judge. The situation will become precarious and detrimental when the private life of persons is not respected to the fullest. Therefore, it is the responsibility of those ensuring public order during the pre-trial investigation phase in ensuring the respect of the private life of the presumed suspect for the proper implementation of the justice process. In ensuring this right, it is established that the empirical and analytical methods of research are necessary in order to show the effective role played by the European Court of Human Rights in respecting the right to private life during the interrogative phase of inquiry. From the findings, it is seen that, though the Court has played a prominent and pertinent role in the respect of private, the suspect continues in experiencing difficulties when it's private life is at at stake, and it always affects the extent of the justice system.

Abstract. This article analyzes the basic principles of international legal acts, the Constitution of the USA and the countries ofthe European Union, regulating relations in the sphere of protection personal and family life. Due to the fact that the concept of “noninterferenceinto privacy” is relatively new to the criminal procedural legislation of Ukraine, the basics for normative legal regulationof a justified interference with privacy by state authorities while conducting criminal investigations are emphasized; their importancefor criminal investigation is paid special attention in judicial consideration along with taking into account the specifics of national le -gislation. The purpose of the article is to investigate the concept of the right to non-interference within the privacy.The study determined the peculiarities of national regulatory approaches to non-interference with private life that have developedlegislation and years of experience in protecting human rights and freedoms. This paper summarizes the international experience ofleading countries in the field of protection of personal and family life is generalized. Since the concept of “non-interference with privatelife” is relatively new to the domestic legislation of Ukraine, it is of great interest to study foreign experience of legal regulation of thisbasis of criminal proceedings. The specificity of the purpose and objectives of the study necessitated the use of dialectical, comparative-legal, historical-legal, formal-logical, system-structural, sociological, and statistical and other methods of scientific search.As a result of the research, on the basis of the analysis of international legal documents, the Constitution of Ukraine, the CriminalProcedure Code of Ukraine and the positions covered in scientific publications, special attention is paid to the urgency on observing theguarantees of non-interference with privacy in criminal proceedings, when there is a high risk of violation of rights and legitimate interestsof its participants. It is argued that restrictions on these rights are possible only in the manner guaranteed by the law and solely toachieve the objectives of criminal proceedings in order to protect the state, society and individual citizens from criminal encroachments.