2009
DOI: 10.1364/oe.17.019173
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Kapitza-Dirac diffraction patterns beyond the Raman-Nath regime

Abstract: Abstract:We study Kapitza-Dirac diffraction of a Bose-Einstein condensate from a standing light wave for a square pulse with variable pulse length but constant pulse area. We find that for sufficiently weak pulses, the usual analytical short-pulse prediction for the Raman-Nath regime continues to hold for longer times, albeit with a reduction of the apparent modulation depth of the standing wave. We quantitatively relate this effect to the Fourier width of the pulse, and draw analogies to the Rabi dynamics of … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
35
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The KD pulse duration (25 s) and the lattice depth V a for atoms of type jai (6 E R , where E R ¼ @ 2 k 2 L =2m is the recoil energy), are chosen such that half of the jai population is diffracted into jAE2i, while higher orders remain largely unpopulated. By analyzing single-component diffraction patterns [20], we have determined the lattice depths for each component, confirming that atoms of type jbi experience < 5% of the lattice depth seen by the jai atoms. On their own, the jbi atoms therefore are not affected by the lattice pulse, as shown in Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The KD pulse duration (25 s) and the lattice depth V a for atoms of type jai (6 E R , where E R ¼ @ 2 k 2 L =2m is the recoil energy), are chosen such that half of the jai population is diffracted into jAE2i, while higher orders remain largely unpopulated. By analyzing single-component diffraction patterns [20], we have determined the lattice depths for each component, confirming that atoms of type jbi experience < 5% of the lattice depth seen by the jai atoms. On their own, the jbi atoms therefore are not affected by the lattice pulse, as shown in Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 75%
“…1(a). The pulse induces Kapitza-Dirac (KD) diffraction [19,20] producing recoiling jai atoms in both positive and negative momentum modes jAE2i jAE2@k L i where k L ¼ 2= L , while the jbi atoms remain unaffected. Subsequently, as illustrated in Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the position operatorẑ, e ±ikẑ can be described as a momentum shift operator: e ±ikẑ |p = |p ±hk [2]. In the momentum representation, the periodical potential V (ẑ), apart from a constant term, can be written in an operator form aŝ V = U 0 4 dp(|p + 2hk p| + |p − 2hk p|), which explicitly shows the momentum change 2hk of an atom scattered by the standing wave [25]. This process is accomplished by absorbing a photon from one of the laser beams and emitting it into the counterpropagating one.…”
Section: A Evolution Operatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Bragg regime, the potential height introduced by the standing wave is restrained below 4E R and that leads to the difficulty of generating higher order momentum states. In the Raman-Nath regime, the intensity of the standing wave is not limited so that higher order momentum states can be generated symmetrically (Gadway et al, 2009;Sapiro et al, 2009b). However the pulse duration has to be short enough to neglect the atomic motion, so the momentum states can not be predicted in this regime if the pulse duration is slightly longer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%