2005
DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2004.040832
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Mass Spectrometry Profiles of the Serum Proteome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter study rigorously examined the circumstances necessary for generation of reproducible and complex spectra, including laser conditions and matrix composition. Equally important is the development and evaluation of the optimal methods of data analysis, including new bioinformatic and biostatistical methods, each with their own specific attributes and drawbacks (49 ). Mass spectrometric profiling is a promising method of marker discovery, but well-designed studies are critical to allow proper interpretation of the clinical utility of the results and identification of key variables.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter study rigorously examined the circumstances necessary for generation of reproducible and complex spectra, including laser conditions and matrix composition. Equally important is the development and evaluation of the optimal methods of data analysis, including new bioinformatic and biostatistical methods, each with their own specific attributes and drawbacks (49 ). Mass spectrometric profiling is a promising method of marker discovery, but well-designed studies are critical to allow proper interpretation of the clinical utility of the results and identification of key variables.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach was simple, available, and not invasive compared with other diagnostic approaches. Biases from sample collection, MALDI‐TOF/TOF MS performance, agents used, and the operator could influence the reproducibility . To minimize these influences, we standardized the collection and fractionation protocol, and optimized parameters of MALDI‐TOF/TOF MS .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biases from sample collection, MALDI-TOF/TOF MS performance, agents used, and the operator could influence the reproducibility. 26,27 To minimize these influences, we standardized the collection and fractionation protocol, and optimized parameters of MALDI-TOF/TOF MS. [28][29][30] Distribution of age and gender between HCC and LC group were taken into account as we collected the patient serum samples. Strikingly, the MALDI-TOF/TOF MS peptide profiling technology needed no knowledge of the amino acid sequence of the peaks or their biological functions for class prediction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This in turns leads to the rather low-resolution pattern that represents only a minority of proteins and peptides in the serum. Other limitations for SELDI protein profiling are due to variability such as in instrumental laser desorption energy level and ProteinChip array quality and in sample collection, processing, and storage (32, 4953). These changes resulted in reproducible changes in serum proteome, and can sometimes overshadow the biological changes in the serum samples (32).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%