Analysis of maximum bite force and chewing efficiency in unilateral temporomandibular joint ankylosis cases treated with buccal fat pad interpositional arthroplasty

Mokhtar, Ejaz Ahmad; Rattan, Vidya; Rai, Sachin; Jolly, Satnam Singh; Lal, Vivek

doi:10.1016/j.bjoms.2021.07.007

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Seven studies reported calibration error and those four studies assessed accuracy drifts due to temperature [ 35 , 43 ], dynamic forces [ 110 ], and force direction [ 110 ]. Calibration errors reported were less than 1% [ 36 , 41 , 111 ], around 2% calibration [ 38 , 43 ], and above 4% [ 33 , 34 ]. The error values are not directly comparable because of the variable sensor designs, testing conditions, and error calculations used.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Performance of Oral Cavity Sensors: A Systematic Review

Bueno

Kwong

Bergmann

2023

Sensors

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Technological advancements are enabling new applications within biomedical engineering. As a connection point between the outer environment and the human system, the oral cavity offers unique opportunities for sensing technologies. This paper systematically reviews the performance of measurement systems tested in the human oral cavity. Performance was defined by metrics related to accuracy and agreement estimation. A comprehensive search identifying human studies that reported on the accuracy or agreement of intraoral sensors found 85 research papers. Most of the literature (62%) was in dentistry, followed by neurology (21%), and physical medicine and rehabilitation (12%). The remaining papers were on internal medicine, obstetrics, and aerospace medicine. Most of the studies applied force or pressure sensors (32%), while optical and image sensors were applied most widely across fields. The main challenges for future adoption include the lack of large human trials, the maturity of emerging technologies (e.g., biochemical sensors), and the absence of standardization of evaluation in specific fields. New research should aim to employ robust performance metrics to evaluate their systems and incorporate real-world evidence as part of the evaluation process. Oral cavity sensors offer the potential for applications in healthcare and wellbeing, but for many technologies, more research is needed.

show abstract