2019
DOI: 10.1155/2019/3503152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Mechanical Properties and Mechanical Anisotropy in Canine Bone Tissues of Various Ages

Abstract: The effect of age on mechanical behavior and microstructure anisotropy of bone is often ignored by researchers engaged in the study of biomechanics. The objective of our study was to determine the variations in mechanical properties of canine femoral cortical bone with age and the mechanical anisotropy between the longitudinal and transverse directions. Twelve beagles divided into three age groups (6, 12, and 36 months) were sacrificed and all femurs were extracted. The longitudinal and transverse samples of c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The anisotropy values range from 1 to 2 which refers to the uniformity degree of a sample. 26
Figure 10.Qualitative evaluation of anisotropy degree of the scaffolds over the course of implantation time (each dot is an individual rat, with the exception of PLDLA-TMC non-implanted sample).
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The anisotropy values range from 1 to 2 which refers to the uniformity degree of a sample. 26
Figure 10.Qualitative evaluation of anisotropy degree of the scaffolds over the course of implantation time (each dot is an individual rat, with the exception of PLDLA-TMC non-implanted sample).
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanical properties of the bone, such as load-displacement curves, elastic modulus, hardness, fracture toughness, strain hardening effect, viscoelasticity, or creep behavior, can be obtained by a needle-like indenter pressed into the surface of the sample. 43 A total of 34 indents were plotted during the test and load-displacement curves were detected on the osteogenic front of the sutures: 10 in the SHAM group, 8 in the distraction group, 8 in the ACS group, and 8 in the ACS +nHAP group. The representative curves of loaddisplacement are shown in Figure 6A, and the elastic modulus and hardness were analyzed through the curves.…”
Section: Nanoindentation Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, reduced porosity and increased density as a result of the reinforcement has been proven by many studies [31][32][33]. Surface hardness is adopted in the strength evaluation because of the inhomogeneity of the bone samples [34]. This index often refers to the deformation or damage resistance of the surface of an object.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%