2017
DOI: 10.17485/ijst/2017/v10i4/110899
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Multiple Hidden Layer vs. Accuracy in Performance using Back Propagation Neural Network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Set the number of hidden layers to 5 (Figure 4c). According to the publication of Asthana et al., [26] the prediction results are better when the number of hidden layers is 5. The activation functions performed in the hidden layer and output layer are “ tansig ” and “ purelin ” functions, attributing to better performance during the training process [27] …”
Section: Machine Learning (Ml) and Prediction Strategymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Set the number of hidden layers to 5 (Figure 4c). According to the publication of Asthana et al., [26] the prediction results are better when the number of hidden layers is 5. The activation functions performed in the hidden layer and output layer are “ tansig ” and “ purelin ” functions, attributing to better performance during the training process [27] …”
Section: Machine Learning (Ml) and Prediction Strategymentioning
confidence: 97%