1999
DOI: 10.1017/s0031182000084675
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of parasite host-switching: limitations on the use of phylogenies

Abstract: SUMMARYEven the most generalist parasites usually occur in only a subset of potential host species, a tendency which reflects overriding environmental constraints on their distributions in nature. The periodic shifting of these limitations represented by host-switches may have been an important process in the evolution of many host-parasite assemblages. To study such events, however, it must first be established where and when they have occurred. Past host-switches within a group of parasites are usually infer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By contrast, when there is a trade‐off between virulence and burst size, host switching can evolve when interspecific competition experienced by the novel host is severe (upper right corner of Figures c,d and c,d). These results could be tested in a factorial analysis exploring host‐range diversification among pathogen lineages that vary in the key constraints, and that may also differ on whether they (or their ancestors) inhabited communities where host competition is either primarily symmetric or asymmetric (but see Jackson, for the inherent limitations of such an approach). A comparative approach examining host shifts among communities of potentially competing host species that comprise the sylvatic cycle of several emerging pathogens (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast, when there is a trade‐off between virulence and burst size, host switching can evolve when interspecific competition experienced by the novel host is severe (upper right corner of Figures c,d and c,d). These results could be tested in a factorial analysis exploring host‐range diversification among pathogen lineages that vary in the key constraints, and that may also differ on whether they (or their ancestors) inhabited communities where host competition is either primarily symmetric or asymmetric (but see Jackson, for the inherent limitations of such an approach). A comparative approach examining host shifts among communities of potentially competing host species that comprise the sylvatic cycle of several emerging pathogens (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Host switching is a general term for colonization of new host taxa, occurring when a parasite lineage establishes in, and evolves with, a previously unexploited host lineage, abandoning the original host lineage completely or leaving a sister parasite lineage within it (Blair et al, 2001). The sister lineage may or may not then speciate if the host switch involves a definitive host (Jackson, 1999;Johnson et al, 2003). Host switching is commonplace, attracting much study in relation to adaptive radiation, speciation and phylogeny, and generalism vs. specialism (for extensive reviews see Poulin, 2007;Hoberg & Brooks, 2008).…”
Section: Lateral Incorporation and The Generalist-specialist Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Co-evolutionary dragging and co-speciation (a second form of phylogenetic tracking) provide plausible explanations of some adaptive radiations (e.g. Jackson, 1999;Verneau et al, 2009). Parasite speciation can also take place within a host species, due to colonization of different microhabitats within it ('duplication', Page & Charleston, 1998;Verneau et al, 2009).…”
Section: Co-evolutionary 'Dragging'mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, pollinator species duplication in the absence of host speciation, followed by cospeciation and subsequent asymmetric extinction, a phenomenon we will call duplication/extinction hereafter, is another mechanism that can cause incongruence between host phylogeny and partner phylogeny [ 16 ]. Although different in essence, these phenomena lead to similar patterns of phylogenetic incongruence, and discriminating between them is often largely speculative [ 17 ]. Nevertheless, and contrary to host shift, duplication/extinction does not involve plant hybridization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%