Glycosciences 1996
DOI: 10.1002/9783527614738.ch19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Protein–Carbohydrate Interaction Using Engineered Ligands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can thus be expected that the axial 4′-position for recognition of d-Gal and the equatorial 3′,4′-positions for binding d-Man/d-Glc play decisive roles. This assumption is strikingly verified by x-ray crystallography and in solution by chemically engineered ligand derivatives (Rini, 1995;Solís et al, 1996;Weis and Drickamer, 1996;Gabius, 1997a, Solís andDíaz-Mauriño, 1997;Gabius, 1998;Lis and Sharon, 1998;Loris et al, 1998;Rüdiger et al, 1999;). With this structural explanation it becomes obvious why the change of the position of one hydroxyl group to form an epimer discussed during the presentation of the individual members of the monosaccharide alphabet unmistakably has the effect of creating a new letter.…”
Section: How To Define Potent Ligand Mimeticsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…It can thus be expected that the axial 4′-position for recognition of d-Gal and the equatorial 3′,4′-positions for binding d-Man/d-Glc play decisive roles. This assumption is strikingly verified by x-ray crystallography and in solution by chemically engineered ligand derivatives (Rini, 1995;Solís et al, 1996;Weis and Drickamer, 1996;Gabius, 1997a, Solís andDíaz-Mauriño, 1997;Gabius, 1998;Lis and Sharon, 1998;Loris et al, 1998;Rüdiger et al, 1999;). With this structural explanation it becomes obvious why the change of the position of one hydroxyl group to form an epimer discussed during the presentation of the individual members of the monosaccharide alphabet unmistakably has the effect of creating a new letter.…”
Section: How To Define Potent Ligand Mimeticsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The tolerance of ·2,3-sialylation by galectins explains their binding to poly-N-acetyllactosamine chains (Galß1,4GlcNAcß1,3 units) and possibly also to internal sites, for example presented by the ganglioside GM 1 , a major galectin ligand on human neuroblastoma cells [Gabius, 1997a;Kopitz et al, 1998;André et al, 1999b]. With respect to the mentioned influence of the often nonphysiological conditions for crystallization it is notable that a thorough comparison of ricin's mode of ligand binding by crystallographic analysis and chemical mapping intimates a difference attributed to the pH in the crystallization protocol [Solís et al, 1993;Solís and Díaz-Mauriño, 1997]. These examples allow to insinuate that exploitation of engineered ligands is a great asset for mapping the hydrogen-bonding pattern with implications for drug design [Solís and Díaz-Mauriño, 1997;Rüdiger et al, 2000].…”
Section: How Lectins and Carbohydrate Ligands Interactmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With respect to the mentioned influence of the often nonphysiological conditions for crystallization it is notable that a thorough comparison of ricin's mode of ligand binding by crystallographic analysis and chemical mapping intimates a difference attributed to the pH in the crystallization protocol [Solís et al, 1993;Solís and Díaz-Mauriño, 1997]. These examples allow to insinuate that exploitation of engineered ligands is a great asset for mapping the hydrogen-bonding pattern with implications for drug design [Solís and Díaz-Mauriño, 1997;Rüdiger et al, 2000]. As similarly added to the section on crystal-lography, voicing sources of potential complications is nonetheless essential to avoid to be led astray in special instances.…”
Section: How Lectins and Carbohydrate Ligands Interactmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations