1981
DOI: 10.2466/pr0.1981.48.1.23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Relationships among Hypnotic Susceptibility, Personality Type, and Vividness of Mental Imagery

Abstract: This study was designed to clarify the rather elusive nature of hypnotic susceptibility by examining its relationship to Jungian personality types and vividness of mental imagery. The results evidenced minimal and nonsignificant relationships among all variables for the total sample of subjects. However, since there was a significant difference between mean scores of 22 males and 33 females on hypnotic susceptibility, a further examination of these relationships was undertaken within each sex. Once again, neit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus it may be that the present sample may not sufficiently correspond to previous research samples of extraverts and introverts. In addition, sex differences were not examined in this study, and this factor was of consequence in Van Dyne's (1981 ) study of imagery.…”
Section: Data Analysis and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Thus it may be that the present sample may not sufficiently correspond to previous research samples of extraverts and introverts. In addition, sex differences were not examined in this study, and this factor was of consequence in Van Dyne's (1981 ) study of imagery.…”
Section: Data Analysis and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Results from other research have shown a similar sex difference in nonhypnotic or hetero-hypnotic imagery. VanDyne and Stava (1981) found that female Ss experienced more vivid hetero-hypnotic imagery than male Ss did. Crawford (1982) found that females had more vivid waking state imagery than male Ss.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Vivid imagers were both low and highly hypnotizable, whereas those with poor imagery tended to be nonresponsive (Comey & Kirsch, 1999;Hilgard, 1970Hilgard, /1979Spanos, 1991;Sutcliffe, Perry & Sheehan, 1970;Van Dyne & Stava, 1981). Others who have used Betts Questionnaire Upon Mental Imagery (Betts, 1909) found higher imagery in high hypnotizables (Page, 1998) or no relationship at all for imagery and hypnotic susceptibility (Perry, 1973).…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%