2012
DOI: 10.5550/sp.3.2011.03
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Results at Eurobasket 2011 – Final Results of Observed Elements of Basketball Game

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The similar work whose focus was on the two models from EuroBasket 2011 included thirteen variables, out of which nine, or 75%, were shooting efficiency indicators (44). Therefore, one of the conclusions here is that if teams were to win a basketball game, they should aim at creating plenty of shooting opportunities for their players -a notion observed by other researchers as well (45).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The similar work whose focus was on the two models from EuroBasket 2011 included thirteen variables, out of which nine, or 75%, were shooting efficiency indicators (44). Therefore, one of the conclusions here is that if teams were to win a basketball game, they should aim at creating plenty of shooting opportunities for their players -a notion observed by other researchers as well (45).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Therefore, ΔPTS can also be defined as an outcome of all observed game parameters as they eventuate. For that reason, we designed a reliable quantitative model measuring the evaluation of influence of certain standard game parameters on the final result, and this model was based on the formation of a multiple linear regression model in which ΔPTS stands as a subordinate (dependent) variable, while differences (Δ) of other game parameters stand for insubordinate (independent) variables, and the selection of variables in the set of regression should point to the specific weight of each observed variable (Simović, Komić, Matković, & Nićin, 2012). This paper made use of two basic models of regression.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analizando el partido desde el punto de vista global y en función de su resultado final, otros autores determinaron que los tiros libres eran significativos para la victoria de los partidos, tales como Neves (1992) en los partidos en cuyo resultado final se llegó con una diferencia de 10 puntos, Sampaio (1998), Sampaio y Janeira (2003a), ambos estudios con un resultado final de 12 puntos de diferencia y, en el estudio de Leite, et al (2004) analizando la LR portuguesa en la temporada 2000/01. En definitiva, los tiros libres constituyen una variable significativa para la victoria (Ibáñez, et al, 2003a;Sampaio & Janeira, 2003a;Simović, Komić, Matković, & Nicin, 2011).…”
Section: Resultados Delunclassified
“…Los lanzamientos de 3 puntos fallados en los estudios de , Kaminsky (1990), Leite, et al (2004) y, Navarro, et al (2009). Para los lanzamientos de campo de 2 y 3 puntos resultaron significativos para los ganadores en los estudios de García, et al (2013a); Kozar, et al (1994); Simović, et al (2011).…”
Section: Resultados Delunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation