1984
DOI: 10.1016/0094-114x(84)90042-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of roller chain sprocket pressure angles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Naji and Marshek (9) have theoretically analysed the case for a worn straightbar chain, while the worn cranked chain is discussed in the present paper. Figure 2 shows the chain bearing geometry for cranked or offset chain and straight sidebar chain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Naji and Marshek (9) have theoretically analysed the case for a worn straightbar chain, while the worn cranked chain is discussed in the present paper. Figure 2 shows the chain bearing geometry for cranked or offset chain and straight sidebar chain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In the 1950s and 1960s, Binder [1] and Rachner [2] presented the ® rst step to an analysis of forces and stresses in a chain drive, by assuming that the contact angle relative to the symmetry line of each tooth was constant. In the early 1980s, Naji [3] and Naji and Marshek [4,5] complemented Binder' s and Rachner' s research by theoretical and experimental investigations studying contact phenomena under quasi-static conditions due to non-trivial geometry of the sprocket tooth. In the 1990s, Kim and Johnson [6,7] improved the model employed by Naji [3] and Naji and Marshek' s [4,5] model using the full ANSI standard geometry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was also found that a sprocket with a fewer number of teeth can accommodate a higher percentage pitch difference without jumpage. Naji and Marshek (1984) pointed out that in cases where the pitch difference is due to wear-elongation of the chain, the contact points and, consequently, the pressure angles and the chain articulation angles each converge to two distinct values. These two values are only a function of the pitch difference.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of the pitch difference between the chain links and the sprocket teeth, it was found that a larger pitch of the sprocket tooth amplifies the tension in the chain link. Naji and Marshek (1984) examined the effect of the pitch difference on the roller-chain articulation angles and pressure angles. The tooth surface assumed to consist of four portions: seating curve, working curve, straight portion, and topping curve.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%