1981
DOI: 10.2307/3151321
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Sales Call Effectiveness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wittink, 2002) to significantly negative (e.g. Parsons & Vanden Abeele, 1981), supporting the earlier articulated view that the effects of promotional expenditures are heterogeneous Manchanda et al, 2005;Venkataraman & Stremersch, 2007). Some of the variation may be explained by the fact that detailing primarily affects the product share positively.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Wittink, 2002) to significantly negative (e.g. Parsons & Vanden Abeele, 1981), supporting the earlier articulated view that the effects of promotional expenditures are heterogeneous Manchanda et al, 2005;Venkataraman & Stremersch, 2007). Some of the variation may be explained by the fact that detailing primarily affects the product share positively.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…Product level: Fischer and Albers (2008), Montgomery and Silk (1972), Murphy, Smith, and Juergens, (1992), Neslin (2001), Narayanan, Desiraju, and Chintagunta (2004), Parsons and Vanden Abeele (1981), Rosenthal et al (2003), Wittink (2002) Mixed results on effects of promotional instruments. Most studies report small significant positive effects of detailing, other studies report the absence of any effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…More recently, Pantelidaki and Bunn (2005) proposed a multifunctional sales model with the diagnostic aid of artificial neural networks (ANN) models for toothpaste product sales forecasting, based on sales price, advertising, promotion, and competitors' price variables. Other similar sales forecasting studies include, but are not limited to, Arora (1979), Dubin (1998), Fader et al (2004), Foster et al (2004, Gelfand et al (1998), Lee et al (2003), Moe and Fader (2002), Parsons and Abeele (1981), Putler and Lele (2003), Steffens (2001), and Wacker and Lummus (2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Accordingly, numerous marketing research studies have focused on the effectiveness of these visits. Early endeavors by marketing scholars in this field used aggregate data to examine the effect of detailing visits on drug sales (Lilien et al 1981;Parsons and Vanden Abeele 1981). In the past decade, several studies have used panel data to investigate the effect of detailing visits on the demand for pharmaceutical drugs (e.g., Kamakura et al 2004;Gonul et al 2001;Manchanda and Chintagunta 2004;Venkataraman and Stremersch 2007).…”
Section: Promoting New Treatments To Maximize Unit Sales Of a New Trementioning
confidence: 99%