2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.04.15.043364
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in COVID-19 Convalescent Blood using a Coronavirus Antigen Microarray

Abstract: The current practice for diagnosis of COVID-19, based on SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing of pharyngeal or respiratory specimens in a symptomatic patient at high epidemiologic risk, likely underestimates the true prevalence of infection. Serologic methods can more accurately estimate the disease burden by detecting infections missed by the limited testing performed to date. Here, we describe the validation of a coronavirus antigen microarray containing immunologically significant antigens from SARS-CoV-2, in addition to… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
84
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
6
84
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, it should be appreciated that the current platform is programmed to detect the capture of IgG antibodies; thus, the resultant signal (or lack thereof) for a particular antigen could be the consequence of prevalences between different isotypes (IgA, IgD, IgE, IgG, IgM), which are known to evolve during the course of infection and subsequent resolution. Although currently focused on three antigens, this platform can be readily expanded to study differential antibody responses to different SARS-CoV-2 antigens and subdomains of those antigens amongst individuals, which are actively being investigated by others [52][53][54][55]. We are currently working to include not only other antigens from SARS-CoV-2 (E protein, M protein, etc.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, it should be appreciated that the current platform is programmed to detect the capture of IgG antibodies; thus, the resultant signal (or lack thereof) for a particular antigen could be the consequence of prevalences between different isotypes (IgA, IgD, IgE, IgG, IgM), which are known to evolve during the course of infection and subsequent resolution. Although currently focused on three antigens, this platform can be readily expanded to study differential antibody responses to different SARS-CoV-2 antigens and subdomains of those antigens amongst individuals, which are actively being investigated by others [52][53][54][55]. We are currently working to include not only other antigens from SARS-CoV-2 (E protein, M protein, etc.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, we applied a robust SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Microarray technology which has superior sensitivity and specificity relative to what were currently available FDA-approved tests used by others. 15 Third, we recruited a sufficiently large sample of adults to calculate seroprevalence by race/ethnicity, age, and gender, which may uncover important differences across these groups. Fourth, we recruit subjects by administering a questionnaire without initially disclosing an offer for an antibody test.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, infection with SARS-CoV-2 has recently been shown to increase IgG seroreactivity to HCoVs 21 , supporting the existence of shared epitopes. Numerous serology assays that are being developed have also detected SARS-CoV-2reactive antibodies in a considerable proportion of SARS-CoV-2-uninfected individuals, which has often been considered as unspecific binding, rather than HCoV-elicited specific antibodies [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]22 . Based on our data, we would argue that this is the result of cross-reactivity between HCoVs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%