2021
DOI: 10.1088/1674-1056/abc2be
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of secondary electron emission using the fractal method*

Abstract: Based on the rough surface topography with fractal parameters and the Monte–Carlo simulation method for secondary electron emission properties, we analyze the secondary electron yield (SEY) of a metal with rough surface topography. The results show that when the characteristic length scale of the surface, G, is larger than 1 × 10−7, the surface roughness increases with the increasing fractal dimension D. When the surface roughness becomes larger, it is difficult for entered electrons to escape surface. As a re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The number of oxygen molecules desorbed was approximately 1.5×10 15 , which differs by approximately 55% from the above multilayer adsorption model's predictions. The following explains the difference between results.…”
Section: Desorption Experimentscontrasting
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The number of oxygen molecules desorbed was approximately 1.5×10 15 , which differs by approximately 55% from the above multilayer adsorption model's predictions. The following explains the difference between results.…”
Section: Desorption Experimentscontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…With a coverage of about 0.90, the calculated number of O 2 adsorbing particles per cm 2 is 6.7×10 14 . Using the desorption during heating in an experiment, the gas change is determined to be 1.5×10 15 , which differs by 55% from the results from the multilayer adsorption model. This result can be explained by the fact that the metal surface is not perfectly flat and has slight depressions, resulting in a larger measurement result.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…( 28) is a constant a little larger than 1. Therefore, since λ , B, and ε are independent of E po [39][40][41] and from Eqs. ( 2), (6), and ( 28), the ratio of δ H to δ h relative to a NEASLD can be expressed as…”
Section: Relations Among Parametersmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…From Eqs. ( 2), (6), and (28), the fact that λ , B, and ε are independent of E po [39][40][41] and that K(E po , ρ, Z) at H ≥ E po ≥ h keV of a NEASLD can be approximated as a constant K(E po , ρ, Z) ChH , we can derive Eq. ( 28) with respect to E po and obtain the relationships among parameters of a NEASLD…”
Section: Relations Among Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%