2014
DOI: 10.5408/13-104.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Spatial Concepts, Spatial Skills and Spatial Representations in New York State Regents Earth Science Examinations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
6
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Spatial reasoning skills are more strongly correlated with entry, performance, and persistence in STEM disciplines than Suite of Assessments (SAT) scores (Shea et al, 2001;Webb et al, 2007;Wai et al, 2009); they even correlate with creative accomplishments as measured by patents and publications (Kell et al, 2013). Despite this convincing evidence that spatial reasoning skills are important for student success in STEM disciplines, spatial reasoning skills are not systematically instructed or tested in K-12 education (National Research Council, 2006;Kastens et al, 2014;Ormand et al, 2014) or assessed among incoming undergraduate students, and they are seldom explicitly included in instruction at the college level. Not surprisingly, spatial skills are unevenly distributed in the population (e.g., National Research Council, 2006;Kastens et al, 2014), which presents a challenge to university instructors teaching spatially demanding courses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Spatial reasoning skills are more strongly correlated with entry, performance, and persistence in STEM disciplines than Suite of Assessments (SAT) scores (Shea et al, 2001;Webb et al, 2007;Wai et al, 2009); they even correlate with creative accomplishments as measured by patents and publications (Kell et al, 2013). Despite this convincing evidence that spatial reasoning skills are important for student success in STEM disciplines, spatial reasoning skills are not systematically instructed or tested in K-12 education (National Research Council, 2006;Kastens et al, 2014;Ormand et al, 2014) or assessed among incoming undergraduate students, and they are seldom explicitly included in instruction at the college level. Not surprisingly, spatial skills are unevenly distributed in the population (e.g., National Research Council, 2006;Kastens et al, 2014), which presents a challenge to university instructors teaching spatially demanding courses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite this convincing evidence that spatial reasoning skills are important for student success in STEM disciplines, spatial reasoning skills are not systematically instructed or tested in K-12 education (National Research Council, 2006;Kastens et al, 2014;Ormand et al, 2014) or assessed among incoming undergraduate students, and they are seldom explicitly included in instruction at the college level. Not surprisingly, spatial skills are unevenly distributed in the population (e.g., National Research Council, 2006;Kastens et al, 2014), which presents a challenge to university instructors teaching spatially demanding courses. This uneven distribution of skills allows some students to perform discipline-specific tasks or interpret scientific communication easily, while others struggle (Kastens et al, 2009(Kastens et al, , 2014.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Informal Science pedagogical approaches focus on students' intrinsic goals and interests, using tools of investigation, scientific reasoning, clarifying content and concept knowledge, and development of an identity as critical thinkers. The two other fields of pedagogical research that support the summer and the future courses are Place-Based Learning (Semken & Freeman 2008) and Spatial Thinking (Kastens et al 2014).…”
Section: Summer 1: Informal Learning Teaching and Researching At Thmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Raciocinar geologicamente é uma operação complexa e aplicável às incertezas; assim, os geólogos são forçados a formular interpretações e suposições, porque raramente têm acesso a todos os dados necessários para tomar decisões (Frodeman, 1996;2010). Independentemente da escala de trabalho, pensar geologicamente implica a capacidade de inferir os significados de padrões observados nas rochas, relevantes para a reconstituição da história geológica de uma determinada região (Chadwick, 1978;Kastens et al, 2014).…”
unclassified