Analysis of Special Teacher's Interest in 2015 Special Education Basic Curriculum

Shin, Seoyoung; Changun, Park，; 이해란,

doi:10.19049/jsped.2018.19.3.08

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Various types of vocational and transition education are offered. Therefore, integrated education in middle and high schools is a key for career and vocational education (Shin et al, 2018).…”

Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysis of research on Korea’s 2015 revised special – Education curriculum

Chang

Jeon²

2022

Front. Educ.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this study was to analyze contents of Korea’s 2015 revised special education curriculum, focusing on papers published in Korean journals and candidate journals from 2016 (i.e., after December 2015 when the 2015 revised special education curriculum was established) to 2022 (present). Future research directions regarding the curriculum are also presented. To this end, this study analyzed 29 academic papers related to the 2015 revised special education curriculum, in line with the purpose of this study. These studies on the 2015 revised special education curriculum were analyzed as follows. First, trends of study purpose had seven subcategories: analysis of curriculum fitness (one paper), curriculum implementation (six papers), exploration of meanings (four papers), analysis of interest (two papers), identification of contents and characteristics (8 papers), development of curriculum elements (one paper), and reconstitution of curriculum (one paper). Second, based on themes, studies were categorized into studies on general guidelines (seven papers) and studies on subject curriculum (20 papers). Based on study results, future curriculum revision and research directions are discussed.

show abstract

Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning

confidence: 99%