“…It is important to note that the presence of hematite, confirmed by CRS, is not directly visible by the magnetic hysteresis loops owing to its low saturation magnetization of 0.3 Am 2 kg -1 (Morrish, 1995;Cornell and Schwertmann, 2003), one order of magnitude smaller than that of magnetite (92-100 Am 2 kg -1 ) (Dunlop and Ozdemir, 1997;Cornell and Schwertmann, 2003). Raman shift (cm -1 ) Going into the intermediate region between 1 and 3 cm, the magnetic hysteresis loops become wasp-waisted (Figure 2e), as observed in archaeological samples containing ε-Fe2O3 (McIntosh et al, 2007(McIntosh et al, , 2011Lopez-Sanchez et al, 2017a;Molina-Cardin et al, 2018;Calvo-Rathert et al, 2019;Kostadinova-Avramova et al, 2019a;Lee et al, 2019;Kosterov et al, 2020). The wasp-waisted hysteresis shape is due to two distinct magnetic populations with highly contrasting coercivities (Figure 2e): (1) a low coercivity, high remanence contribution, and (2) a high coercivity, low remanence contribution (Tauxe et al, 1996).…”