2020
DOI: 10.37891/kpej.v3i1.119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Students' Critical Thinking Skills in Physics Problems

Abstract: This study aims to determine the proportion of students' level of critical thinking skills on the subject of Impulse and Momentum, any difficulties experienced by students to reach the level of critical thinking skills, and solutions to overcome the difficulties of students achieving critical thinking skills. This research uses descriptive qualitative research methods. The subjects of this study were 27 students taken by purposive sampling technique. Data collection techniques in this study are tests of critic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0
30

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
26
0
30
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings indicate that students have not been able to evaluate well, where students are still not able to distinguish relevant and irrelevant information and have not been able to evaluate the statements given in the questions. This finding is in line with Ariani's (2020) finding that the evaluation indicator has the lowest achievement among other critical thinking skills indicators, which is only 13.87%, which indicates that students have a deficiency in determining the right strategy in solving problems. The solution to these problems is to familiarize students with working on questions evaluating social science problems or issues in classroom learning.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…These findings indicate that students have not been able to evaluate well, where students are still not able to distinguish relevant and irrelevant information and have not been able to evaluate the statements given in the questions. This finding is in line with Ariani's (2020) finding that the evaluation indicator has the lowest achievement among other critical thinking skills indicators, which is only 13.87%, which indicates that students have a deficiency in determining the right strategy in solving problems. The solution to these problems is to familiarize students with working on questions evaluating social science problems or issues in classroom learning.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Previous research stated that students need critical thinking skills (Ariani, 2020;Saprudin et al, 2019;Seibert, 2020). Other research findings also state that critical reading is needed by students so that students can understand the contents of the reading correctly (Akın et al, 2015;Reilly, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Proses pembelajaran scientific merupakan perpaduan antara proses pembelajaran yang semula terfokus pada eksplorasi, elaborasi, dan konfirmasi dilengkapi dengan mengamati, menanya, menalar, mencoba, dan mengkomunikasikan (Ariani, 2020;Diani, 2016;HS & S, 2021). Peran guru bukan lagi sebagai sumber belajar, namun hanya berperan sebagai fasilitator memberikan bantuan (scaffolding) ketika peserta didik mengalami kesulitan, serta guru bukan satu-satunya sumber belajar.…”
Section: Hasil Dan Pembahasanunclassified