2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2014.11.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the absorption kinetics of macromolecules following intradermal and subcutaneous administration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, we show that plasma concentrations of Nexvax2 peptides 45 min after intradermal injection are dose-dependent, which confirms systemic bioavailability that would facilitate engagement of cognate T cells at distant sites, including the gut, within 45 min of administration. Thus, the pharmacokinetics of Nexvax2 is consistent with other intradermally administered peptides that show dose-dependent pharmacokinetics and achieve maximal concentrations within 1 h, and dose exposure similar to subcutaneous administration ( Milewski et al, 2015 ). Plasma concentrations of each of the three Nexvax2 peptides were similar at 45 min post-treatment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…In the present study, we show that plasma concentrations of Nexvax2 peptides 45 min after intradermal injection are dose-dependent, which confirms systemic bioavailability that would facilitate engagement of cognate T cells at distant sites, including the gut, within 45 min of administration. Thus, the pharmacokinetics of Nexvax2 is consistent with other intradermally administered peptides that show dose-dependent pharmacokinetics and achieve maximal concentrations within 1 h, and dose exposure similar to subcutaneous administration ( Milewski et al, 2015 ). Plasma concentrations of each of the three Nexvax2 peptides were similar at 45 min post-treatment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…20,21 We speculate this may in part be affected by more consistent and technically simpler delivery with subcutaneous as opposed to intradermal injection. While geometric mean ratio (subcutaneous to intradermal) point estimates for AUC(0-inf) and C max were contained within the standard 90% confidence interval (bioequivalency) limits of 80%-125%, the upper bound consistently fell above the range.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In alignment with prior reports of protein-based therapies, peak plasma concentrations occurred earlier for intradermal vs subcutaneous administration, and total exposure was greater for the latter delivery route. 20,21 We speculate this may in part be affected by more consistent and technically simpler delivery with subcutaneous as opposed to intradermal injection. Notably, the present study used the same injection number and volume for each administration route, though it is not anticipated that using a single subcutaneous as opposed to several intradermal injections for each 900-μg dose would have made a meaningful difference in results.…”
Section: Pharmacokinetics Of Individual Peptides and The Drug Productmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blisters formed due to repeated intradermal injection of rmIL-23 increase hydrostatic pressure in the interstitium, which might cause rapid absorption of rmIL-23 into capillaries. It has been observed that intradermal administration of proteins produced higher maximum serum concentration (C max ) and a left shift in serum concentration profiles compared to the subcutaneous route (Milewski et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%