2016
DOI: 10.1134/s0030400x16060023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the accuracy of the inverse problem solution for a differential heterodyne microscope as applied to rectangular plasmonic waveguides

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the results reported here, one can surmise that, for any other (particular) metasurface type, the probe beam parameters (their sizes and separation) should be optimized in order to make the metasurface profile retrieval easier and more reliable. However, the proper modeling of the SDHM response and the inverse problem solution [22] would be required to understand the characterization results obtained for metasurfaces with very high phase gradients (and therefore very small cell sizes). In the extreme case of metasurfaces designed for the excitation of surface waves, one can also resort to the metasurface characterization at shorter wavelengths, since it is rather straightforward to simulate the "ideal metasurface" response (with known design parameters) for any wavelength.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the results reported here, one can surmise that, for any other (particular) metasurface type, the probe beam parameters (their sizes and separation) should be optimized in order to make the metasurface profile retrieval easier and more reliable. However, the proper modeling of the SDHM response and the inverse problem solution [22] would be required to understand the characterization results obtained for metasurfaces with very high phase gradients (and therefore very small cell sizes). In the extreme case of metasurfaces designed for the excitation of surface waves, one can also resort to the metasurface characterization at shorter wavelengths, since it is rather straightforward to simulate the "ideal metasurface" response (with known design parameters) for any wavelength.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%