2014
DOI: 10.1109/tns.2014.2306440
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the AMMON Experimental Program in the EOLE Facility Supporting the Qualification of the JHR Neutron and Photon Tools

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter calculations were performed with the TRIPOLI4 Monte Carlo code [8], using a full three-dimensional representation of the AMMON core in the "hafnium" configuration [9]. For better understanding of the following graphs, all measurements were made clockwise with respect to Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter calculations were performed with the TRIPOLI4 Monte Carlo code [8], using a full three-dimensional representation of the AMMON core in the "hafnium" configuration [9]. For better understanding of the following graphs, all measurements were made clockwise with respect to Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A systematic underestimation of the calculated global photon energy deposition is still remaining but has been reduced drastically from about -20% ± 13 % to -8 % ± 4.5 % (1σ) [18]. This underestimation could be partially explained by an underestimation in the JEFF3 prompt photon emission ( 235 U(n,f)) and for 27 Al neutron interactions in the sensor surrounding [18]. However, concerning measurement process itself, low level of covariance data information and lack of recent reevaluated data in EEDL, EPDL, EADL and EXDL limits uncertainty derivation.…”
Section: Gamma Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Since the end of the 90s, CEA has upgraded this method for in EOLE and MINERVE facilities [18] for experimental validation of neutron/gamma calculation schemes used for reactor core modelling.…”
Section: Gamma Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thorough representativeness studies have been previously conducted for the transposition of biases to JHR neutron parameters calculations [26,27], based on the representativity method [28]. However, this method cannot be applied in a straightforward manner for photon heating as it requires propagation calculations of a priori uncertainties.…”
Section: Representativeness Of Ammon Core Regarding Jhr Corementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In aluminum, all the activation gamma spectra almost consist of a single 1.78 MeV gamma ray carrying 99% of the total energy. The 1.78 MeV ray corresponds to the gamma ray emitted by beta decay of 28 Al, itself produced by radiative capture of 27 Al.…”
Section: Activation Dosementioning
confidence: 99%