2015
DOI: 10.1007/s13177-015-0115-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the Different Duration Stages of Accidents with Hazard-Based Model

Abstract: This study investigates and identifies significant contributing variables that affect the duration of three traffic accident stages, namely, preparation, travel, and clearance as well as the total duration of the accident. Accelerated failure time (AFT) hazard-based models were developed with different underlying probability distributions for the hazard function, including models with gamma heterogeneity and models with time-varying covariates. The results indicate that the gamma distribution model with a time… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different statistical methods and machine learning methods have been applied in traffic incident duration prediction, including tree-based method (Lin et al , 2016; Weng et al , 2015), Bayesian classifier (Cong et al , 2018; Ozbay and Noyan, 2006; Zou et al , 2021), hazard-based method (Haule et al , 2019; Li et al , 2017; Li et al , 2015) and ANN (Lee et al , 2017). Among these methods, the accelerated failure time (AFT) model is the most widely used hazard-based method (Li et al , 2017; Li et al , 2015). It assumes that the factors related to the incident will accelerate or decelerate the incident duration; thus, it is easily interpreted (Kay and Kinnersley, 2002).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different statistical methods and machine learning methods have been applied in traffic incident duration prediction, including tree-based method (Lin et al , 2016; Weng et al , 2015), Bayesian classifier (Cong et al , 2018; Ozbay and Noyan, 2006; Zou et al , 2021), hazard-based method (Haule et al , 2019; Li et al , 2017; Li et al , 2015) and ANN (Lee et al , 2017). Among these methods, the accelerated failure time (AFT) model is the most widely used hazard-based method (Li et al , 2017; Li et al , 2015). It assumes that the factors related to the incident will accelerate or decelerate the incident duration; thus, it is easily interpreted (Kay and Kinnersley, 2002).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chung et al 6 developed the log-logistic accelerated failure time (AFT) metric model for temporal stability. Additional studies that utilized hazard-based models for predicting different duration stages include Hojati et al 7 and Li et al 8 .Moreover, Pang et al 9 improved the hazard-based duration modeling using a random parameters with heterogeneity in means and variances approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regression methods were widely used for incident duration prediction in previous studies, such as linear regression [12,13]. To overcome the simple linear assumption between incident clearance time and explanatory variables, researchers proposed the hazard-based duration models (HBDM) to predict the incident duration precisely and explore the influence of significant factors on the incident duration, such as the Cox Proportional Hazards (PH) model and the Accelerated Failure Time (AFT) model [14]. Nam and Mannering [5] Lee and Fazio [15] used a proportional hazard-based Coxregression model to analyze the effect of explanatory variables on response time and clearance time, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%