2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.trpro.2017.03.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the Electric Vehicles Adoption over the United States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Chu et al (2019), lower recharging cost is an important motivation for buying an EV. Thus, in comparison, the low price of electricity increases the adoption of EV (Soltani-Sobh et al, 2017). It was found that there were significant savings in societal costs and total cost of ownership when compared to diesel vehicles (Bor en, 2019).…”
Section: Context Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Chu et al (2019), lower recharging cost is an important motivation for buying an EV. Thus, in comparison, the low price of electricity increases the adoption of EV (Soltani-Sobh et al, 2017). It was found that there were significant savings in societal costs and total cost of ownership when compared to diesel vehicles (Bor en, 2019).…”
Section: Context Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scholars with the view of promotion believe that government subsidies can have a positive impact on corporate financial performance, market share, and environmental awareness. Soltani-Sobh et al (2017) consider that the government incentives are positively correlated with the Electric vehicle market share growth in the US. Deng et al (2020) divide government subsidies into selective subsidies and non-selective subsidies, suggesting that selective subsidies can help companies maintain high performance, while the effectiveness of non-selective subsidies depends on the intensity of regional legal protection and market competition.…”
Section: The Role Of Government Subsidiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the effects of other incentive policies are controversial. For example, the effectiveness of free parking on EV adoption is found to be significant by Ferguson et al (16) (25,26), and Soltani-Sobh, et al (27). Such highly aggregate studies ignore spatial variation in EV adoption and cannot decipher the effects of zonal characteristics.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another group of EV adoption literature focuses on aggregate predictions at an international/national/state level using historical EV sales or vehicle registration data. Some recent examples include Sierzchula et al ( 21 ), Jin et al ( 22 ), Narassimhan and Johnson ( 23 ), Lutsey et al ( 24 ), Vergis and Chen ( 25 , 26 ), and Soltani-Sobh, et al ( 27 ). Such highly aggregate studies ignore spatial variation in EV adoption and cannot decipher the effects of zonal characteristics.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%