2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128383
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the environmental impacts of alkali-activated concrete produced with waste glass-derived silicate activator – A LCA study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The environmental investigation carried out using life cycle assessment tools by Bianco et al 9 suggested that alkali-activated concrete produced with waste glass-based activator obtained through the same thermochemical method adopted in this study resulted in carbon emissions of about 100-120 kgCO 2eq /m 3 for concretes having compressive strength in the range 35-50 MPa. In the same study, CO 2 emissions of Portland cement-based concretes were calculated in the range 333 to 409 kgCO 2eq /m 3 for equivalent strength classes.…”
Section: Environmental Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The environmental investigation carried out using life cycle assessment tools by Bianco et al 9 suggested that alkali-activated concrete produced with waste glass-based activator obtained through the same thermochemical method adopted in this study resulted in carbon emissions of about 100-120 kgCO 2eq /m 3 for concretes having compressive strength in the range 35-50 MPa. In the same study, CO 2 emissions of Portland cement-based concretes were calculated in the range 333 to 409 kgCO 2eq /m 3 for equivalent strength classes.…”
Section: Environmental Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The study highlighted that the grinding of glass had a marginal impact on the emissions of the waste-derived activator, and about 67-69 kg of activating powder was required for about 355-370 kg of the binder. 7,9 The mix proportions shown in Table 2 (see Section 2.2) were in the same order of magnitude (about 100 g of powder for 500 g of binder, which corresponds to 72 kg of powder for 360 kg of binder), and the compressive strength of mortars was in the range of 40 MPa at 28 days. Since the process for producing the activating powder is the same, the activator dosages are comparable, and the strength is in the same range, it can be assumed that the CO 2 emissions of concrete produced with BL-based activating powder could be in the range 100-120 kgCO 2eq /m 3 .…”
Section: Environmental Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The authors concluded that using alternative cementitious materials as cement replacements could significantly reduce the environmental impacts of cement-based products (e.g., AAS concrete had 73% lower GHGs, 43% less energy, and 25% less water). In another study, Bianco et al (2021 ) compared the AAM produced with a silicate activator derived from waste glass (AABR) or with commercially available chemicals (AABC) to ordinary portland cement (OPC). The authors showed that the adoption of alkali-activated concretes instead of OPC concrete allows a significant reduction in environmental categories of global warming potential (64% and 70% reduction for AABC and AABR, respectively), acidification potential (23% and 35% reduction for AABC and AABR, respectively), and terrestrial eutrophication (53% and 60% reduction for AABC and AABR, respectively).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%