Analysis of the Governance Structures in Japan’s Biosphere Reserves: Perspectives from Bottom–Up and Multilevel Characteristics

Abstract

This paper analyzes the governance structures of Biosphere Reserves (BRs) in Japan by focusing on six criteria that elucidate the main characteristics therein: general information (nomination process, year of designation, size, and population), legal frameworks, stakeholder identification, and decision-making processes (number of municipalities and role of consociation), administrative institutions (human resources, budgetary situation, and expense distribution), executed BR implementation activities, and participatory/collaborative frameworks. This research consists of a literature review, a questionnaire administered to the secretariats of seven existing BRs and follow-up interviews. Three main characteristics of BRs were identified. First, a responsible local government(s) is nominated to manage the BR rather than the central government. Consequently, BR implementation in Japan is led by those municipalities that have strong motivations for regional development using the BR concept. Second, two types of BR governance structures exist in Japan: the single municipality type and the multi-municipality type. All BRs have so called Kyougikai, a consociation for decision-making, consultation and/or collaboration among stakeholders. In the single municipality structure, the consociation includes diverse actors from private and community sectors, while in the multi-municipality structure, consociations are based in more diplomatic settings and only include members of the public sector. Third, gaps between pre/post-Seville BR implementation sites were identified. The motivations for the formation of pre-Seville BRs, which were designated in 1980 in a top-down fashion prior to an awareness of BRs, varied greatly from those BRs nominated by municipalities after 2010. The authors identified fewer administrative resources and activities associated with the pre-Seville sites.

The implementation of the conceptual shift in conservation: pathways of three German UNESCO biosphere reserves

“…Their governance was top-down and often half-hearted. BRs were commonly superimposed on existing protected areas or research sites (Price et al 2010;Reed and Massie 2013;Bridgewater 2016;Tanaka and Wakamatsu 2018) with the result that the BR title was frequently an add-on without effects on the wider landscape or the management (Schliep and Stoll-Kleemann 2010;Coetzer et al 2014).…”

Governance paradox: implications from Japan’s national parks for managing complex protected areas

“…Follow-up questionnaires were distributed to five PMOs in January 2022 and all answers were received by March 2022. The first questionnaire included questions regarding basic information of the organizations (number of full-time equivalent staff, annual budget, historical records), main activities related to national park management, reason for applying for PMO status, and incentives to be a PMO, following Tanaka and Wakamatsu ( 2018 ). Follow-up questionnaires included the Likert-scale evaluation of transaction costs and benefits obtained from the PMO status.…”

A perspective on biodiversity data and applications for spatio-temporally robust spatial planning for area-based conservation

“…This implies that finer input data would not always be the best in SCP analyses, and analysts need to tune the data resolution depending on one's specific purpose. For example, a long term persistence of efficacy would be particularly important when transaction and relocation costs are prohibitively expensive, such as in the case of establishment of protected areas [29].…”