2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2021.104649
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the impact of a pandemic on the control of the process safety risk in major hazards industries using a Fault Tree Analysis approach

Abstract: The control of the risks associated with major hazard events is critical to the safe and continuous operation of the process industry. Over the last decades, the process industry has been successful at establishing and implementing robust Process Safety Management (PSM) systems to prevent and mitigate the consequences of such major hazard events. While there exist some industry guidelines developed relatively recently for events initiated by natural disasters and security-related threats, for initiating events… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, even complex and safety critical industries are being managed from home as a result of the pandemic. Research (e.g., Ashraf et al, 2022 ) suggests that new challenges associated specifically with such remote work (e.g., poor quality of remote hazard identification, no remote working infrastructure, poor communication with remote workers, inadequate training on the use of remote working tools, etc.) may be leading to safety failures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, even complex and safety critical industries are being managed from home as a result of the pandemic. Research (e.g., Ashraf et al, 2022 ) suggests that new challenges associated specifically with such remote work (e.g., poor quality of remote hazard identification, no remote working infrastructure, poor communication with remote workers, inadequate training on the use of remote working tools, etc.) may be leading to safety failures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equipment-failure-risk assessment is a necessary means to clarify the safety status of the equipment and ensure the normal operation of the chemical systems. There are numerous risk-assessment methods available in process systems, one group of which is based on a combination of logical/probabilistic diagrams and deductive reasoning, such as fault-tree analysis (FTA), event-tree analysis (ETA), the bow-tie model (BT), and Bayesian networks (BNs), and are very widely used for risk and reliability analysis due to their intuitiveness, expressiveness, ease of analysis, and reasoning [2][3][4][5]. Of these, BN is suitable for modelling and analyzing complex systems and has gained much attention Processes 2022, 10, 1863 2 of 30 compared to others, since it can handle the occurrence of multi-state variables, express conditional dependencies among events, and allow for bidirectional reasoning to identify the most failure-prone links of the system better [6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main contributions of this paper are as follows: (1) This study attempts to propose an improved framework integrating intuitionistic fuzzy AHP, trapezoidal intuitionistic fuzzy number-based SAM, and a Bayesian network for failure-risk assessment of a coal gasifier. (2) This framework uses intuitionistic fuzzy AHP to assign the expert weights for reducing subjectivity or the bias caused by individual differences and obtains the likelihood of occurrence of root events in the BN through trapezoidal intuitionistic fuzzy numberbased SAM with experts' judgment. (3) This strategy can more convincingly translate the judgments of all experts into a clear probability value by an intuitionistic fuzzy reasoning approach, thus overcoming the difficulty of obtaining the basic probability data in the BN.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data from the Central Statistics Agency (BPS) for 2020 explains that there has been an increase in the number of poor people from 24.79 million as of September 2019 to 27.55 million as of September 2020 [14]. The impact of this pandemic is also a severe challenge to the sustainability of the government and society [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%