2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.cplett.2003.10.147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the paramagnetic spin–orbit transmission mechanism for NMR spin–spin coupling constants using the paramagnetic spin–orbit density distribution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Fermi contact is directly related to the relative s contribution in the observed atom and is therefore related to the σ bonding scheme of the Tmp ligand. On the other hand, the paramagnetic spin–orbit contribution is related to the π orbitals. , The increase of the 1 J Yb–P value is therefore related to the bonding mode of the phosphorus atom in the Tmp ligand. The NMR of 2-L Et and 2-L Cy is then of high importance to test this conjecture because of the observed η 1 coordination mode, as described above in the X-ray structures.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Fermi contact is directly related to the relative s contribution in the observed atom and is therefore related to the σ bonding scheme of the Tmp ligand. On the other hand, the paramagnetic spin–orbit contribution is related to the π orbitals. , The increase of the 1 J Yb–P value is therefore related to the bonding mode of the phosphorus atom in the Tmp ligand. The NMR of 2-L Et and 2-L Cy is then of high importance to test this conjecture because of the observed η 1 coordination mode, as described above in the X-ray structures.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the theory, in π-systems, 13 C shielding effects are dominated by the paramagnetic term, which mainly results from the coupling of occupied and vacant molecular orbitals close in energy under the effect of the external magnetic field. ,, The strength of the coupling is inversely proportional to the energy difference between the orbitals involved. If, for instance, we take the HOMO–LUMO gap as a measure for these energy differences, then due to the GGA HOMO–LUMO, eigenvalue differences are less than those of hybrid functionals, and the paramagnetic component of the shielding constant for π-donating carbons is increased.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the sp 3 carbons, the diamagnetic term in the CS is dominant. ,, This term is mostly associated with the shielding caused by core orbitals and originates from the ground state of the molecule, which is less sensitive to the approximations used in its calculation. Therefore, no explicit artifacts are observed for such carbons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[21][22][23][24][25][26] Recently such an approach has also been devised for response functions at the level of the second order polarization propagator approximation (SOPPA) [27][28][29] and for relativistic DFT calculations at the level of the zeroth-order regular approximation (ZORA). 30 The third class of approaches proposed by Cremer and co-workers [31][32][33][34][35][36][37] essentially obtains the contribution of a given orbital indirectly by removing the contribution of this orbital in the coupled perturbed DFT calculations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%