2019
DOI: 10.11114/jets.v7i3.3988
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the Relationship Between the Academic Self-Efficacy and Leisure Satisfaction Levels of University Students

Abstract: The aim of this study is to analyze the academic self-efficacy and leisure satisfaction levels of university students according to some variables and to determine the relationship between them. 1053 (642 male and 411 female) students from the Physical Education and Sports College of Bartın University participated in the study. A personal information form prepared by the researchers, the "Academic Self-Efficacy Scale" (ASES) developed by Owen & Froman (1988) and adapted to Turkish by Ekici (2012) and the "L… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
2
0
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
2
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the LSS total score and total score averages of all sub-dimensions were close according to the gender variable, the results proved to be in favor of the male participants. Studies conducted by Acar and Yılmaz [46] on the leisure satisfaction of university students, by Aydın and Yaşartürk [47] on elite athletes studying at university, by Serdar and Demirel [48], on sports science students, by Uluç, Duman, and Acar [49], with university students, by Yaşartürk [50] on sports science students, and by Yaşartürk and Bilgin [51], on university students competing in handball are in line with this study. According to the gender variable, the average scores of men in LSS and its subdimensions were higher than that of women.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Although the LSS total score and total score averages of all sub-dimensions were close according to the gender variable, the results proved to be in favor of the male participants. Studies conducted by Acar and Yılmaz [46] on the leisure satisfaction of university students, by Aydın and Yaşartürk [47] on elite athletes studying at university, by Serdar and Demirel [48], on sports science students, by Uluç, Duman, and Acar [49], with university students, by Yaşartürk [50] on sports science students, and by Yaşartürk and Bilgin [51], on university students competing in handball are in line with this study. According to the gender variable, the average scores of men in LSS and its subdimensions were higher than that of women.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Satisfaction with leisure activities was found to be moderately positive on the whole, with average values across the six dimensions studied ranging from 3 to 4 on a scale of 1 to 5. These findings are in keeping with the results of previous studies applying Beard and Ragheb (1980) Leisure Satisfaction Scale to groups of adolescents and young adults (Ayyildiz et al, 2016;Cetinkaya et al, 2017;Yaşartürk, 2019). Considering that leisure activities are chosen by the individuals themselves, the fact that the satisfaction scores are not higher would seem to indicate that there may be other factors preventing adolescents from feeling completely satisfied with their experience of leisure.…”
Section: Leisure Satisfaction and Precarious Leisuresupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Leisure activities can create positive effects by providing satisfaction not only in individual activities, but also in group activities [8]. Satisfaction develops as a result of the positive perception of leisure activities and is considered as an indicator of the level of satisfaction of an individual in meeting the requirements of that individual in experiential terms [9,10]. The fact that the demographic, socio-cultural, educational, psychological, and economic factors that affect leisure satisfaction vary between individuals shows that the concept can include a wide range of variables [11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%