2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2016.12.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the sensitivity of in vitro bioassays for androgenic, progestagenic, glucocorticoid, thyroid and estrogenic activity: Suitability for drinking and environmental waters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
68
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
8
68
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For biological analysis, stably transfected mammalian cell lines (GeneBLAzer PR-UAS-bla HEK293T and GR-UAS-bla HEK 293T) were used for PR-and GR-mediated responses due to their sensitivity to detect biological responses from surface waters (Leusch et al 2017). The detailed biological analysis procedure is described in the Supplemental Data, Section S1.…”
Section: Biological Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For biological analysis, stably transfected mammalian cell lines (GeneBLAzer PR-UAS-bla HEK293T and GR-UAS-bla HEK 293T) were used for PR-and GR-mediated responses due to their sensitivity to detect biological responses from surface waters (Leusch et al 2017). The detailed biological analysis procedure is described in the Supplemental Data, Section S1.…”
Section: Biological Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It needs to be established whether the candidate bioassay is compatible to test the effects of realistic low‐level mixtures in (concentrated) water extracts without interference of matrix effects, and if the sensitivity of the bioassay is sufficient to detect possible effects of chemicals at concentrations present in drinking water and its sources. For example, a recent study by Leusch et al () has demonstrated that the sensitivity of in vitro bioassays for endocrine activity ranges widely. Available bioassays have sufficient sensitivity for androgenic and estrogenic activity in drinking water.…”
Section: Empirical Evaluation Of a Candidate Bioassaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it can be expected that the different approaches derive (slightly) different EBTs. Even though toxic equivalency approaches are based on the theory that chemicals act via a single well‐defined mechanism such as receptor activation, agonistic and antagonistic mechanisms can occur simultaneously (Leusch et al ). Effects may therefore deviate from those expected from concentration addition, and this may in particular be the case in more complex integrated (heterogeneous) in vitro bioassays.…”
Section: Effect‐based Trigger Values (Ebts)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, with the in vitro detection approach, it appears that a possible major mode of actions of TDCs, thyroid receptor activation, is not environmentally relevant. Further, while the reason for this is not yet clear, and particularly challenging, performance limitation of in vitro assays is highly probable, given the inherent cell type-induced variations in the sensitivity of the widely used in vitro assays to potential TDCs [6] [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, while TR binding assays and reporter gene assays can both detect TDCs with potential to interfere with TR, only reporter gene assays can discriminate between agonist and antagonist activities. Currently, TR binding assays, and a variety of reporter gene assays usually with different cell line types[11], are majorly used in the detection of thyroid disrupting activities in wastewater and surface waters.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%