2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jlumin.2012.08.052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the shift of zero-phonon lines for f–d luminescence of lanthanides in relation to the Dorenbos model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this connection it is interesting to compare the results to those for YAG:Tb where the HS−LS splitting is calculated to be 5 285 cm −1 from the onset of the LS band at 280.7 nm and the ZPL for the HS band at 329.6 nm. 17 This indicates that the covalency for Ce 3+ in the YAG lattice is larger than for Ce 3+ in the LuAG lattice. The very low energy emission of Ce 3+ in YAG can be explained by the lowering of the lowest energy emitting 5d state of Ce 3+ by a combined effect of a large CF splitting and a high covalency.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In this connection it is interesting to compare the results to those for YAG:Tb where the HS−LS splitting is calculated to be 5 285 cm −1 from the onset of the LS band at 280.7 nm and the ZPL for the HS band at 329.6 nm. 17 This indicates that the covalency for Ce 3+ in the YAG lattice is larger than for Ce 3+ in the LuAG lattice. The very low energy emission of Ce 3+ in YAG can be explained by the lowering of the lowest energy emitting 5d state of Ce 3+ by a combined effect of a large CF splitting and a high covalency.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…120 The applicability of this approach is however limited since ZPLs are most often obscured in spectra of 4f-5d transitions. This is the energy which is used for constructing the energy level schemes.…”
Section: Vibronic Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a direct consequence of the fact that these empirical charge-state transition level schemes do not take vibronic interactions or correlation (i.e. multiplet) effects into account [47,8]. In the case of Ce 3+ , there is a clear difference in the details of the 5d manifold for both defects.…”
Section: Also Upon Cementioning
confidence: 99%