2011 International Conference on Advanced Power System Automation and Protection 2011
DOI: 10.1109/apap.2011.6180432
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the sympathetic tripping problem for networks with high penetrations of Distributed Generation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, [14] stipulates that in the event of a network undervoltage, converters are required to remain connected for a minimum of 140 ms to avoid sympathetic tripping for faults elsewhere in the network [15]. However it is difficult to see how these requirements apply to less robust converter types, where connection for this period of time may result in the flow of damaging current magnitudes flowing through the converter.…”
Section: Quantification Of DC Protection System Operating Requirementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, [14] stipulates that in the event of a network undervoltage, converters are required to remain connected for a minimum of 140 ms to avoid sympathetic tripping for faults elsewhere in the network [15]. However it is difficult to see how these requirements apply to less robust converter types, where connection for this period of time may result in the flow of damaging current magnitudes flowing through the converter.…”
Section: Quantification Of DC Protection System Operating Requirementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this manner, the underdamped response impedance can be expressed as (15) and the overdamped impedance is equal to (16) Having derived these expressions it can be seen how the various circuit parameters shape the transient response. For example, shows how the resistance and inductance parameters affect the exponential decay.…”
Section: A Analysis Of DC Microgrid Fault Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary, the DG presence causes some technical problems that must be rapidly faced and solved like:  The increase of short circuit currents;  The increased complexity of automation and protection systems;  The increased complexity of voltage regulation due to a modification of power flows;  The unwanted MV systems islanding [9,10].…”
Section: Distributed Generation Possible Benefits and Problematicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, with regards to the undervoltage protection requirements evaluated and reported upon in this paper there is no conflict. This paper builds on the work of [9] by evaluating the response of a single-phase 3 kW inverter to faults in a laboratory environment (section 2). The observed responses have subsequently been used to create a model of the inverter within the PSCAD simulation package [18]; this allows the behaviour of several small inverter installations to be characterised accurately.…”
Section: /11kvmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kyle I. Jennett, Campbell D. Booth, Federico Coffele and Andrew J. Roscoe 2 [5,6], unwanted islanding [7,8] and sympathetic tripping [9,10]. The severity of these problems is likely to increase as Distributed Generation proliferates in future.…”
Section: Investigation Of the Sympathetic Tripping Problem In Power Smentioning
confidence: 99%