1987
DOI: 10.1016/0004-6981(87)90115-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the uptake of atmospheric ammonia by leaves of Phaseolus vulgaris L.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…7a), J NH $ showed a linear correlation to c NH $ . A linear dependency between J NH $ and c NH $ has already been observed in laboratory experiments with Phaseolus vulgaris (Farquhar et al, 1980 ;Van Hove et al, 1987) ; Populus euamericana (Van Hove et al, 1989) ; Picea abies (Kesselmeier et al, 1993) ; and Hordeum vulgare . In the NO # -fumigation assays, both in the field (Fig.…”
Section: mentioning
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…7a), J NH $ showed a linear correlation to c NH $ . A linear dependency between J NH $ and c NH $ has already been observed in laboratory experiments with Phaseolus vulgaris (Farquhar et al, 1980 ;Van Hove et al, 1987) ; Populus euamericana (Van Hove et al, 1989) ; Picea abies (Kesselmeier et al, 1993) ; and Hordeum vulgare . In the NO # -fumigation assays, both in the field (Fig.…”
Section: mentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Van Hove et al (1987) observed a linear correlation between stomatal conductance of P. vulgaris and J NH $ , and reported that deposition of NH $ on the cuticles was negligible. Our results suggest that it plays a significant role under particular environmental conditions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NH 3 is highly reactive and forms soluble products inside the leaves as can be exemplified by the following equation: NH 3 + H 2 O ↔ NH 4 + + OH -. The major determinants for NH 3 deposition are stomatal conductance and environmental conditions, particularly humidity and light that increase the rate of deposition (Van Hove et al 1987).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NH $ enters the leaf mainly through stomata (van Hove et al, 1987(van Hove et al, , 1989(van Hove et al, , 1991Husted & Schjoerring, 1995a ; and uptake is driven by the NH $ concentration gradient between the atmosphere and the substomatal cavity. A high NH $ concentration within the leaf lowers NH $ uptake or may even cause NH $ emissions when the atmospheric NH $ concentration is below the internal concentration.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under field conditions, where leaf surfaces may be wet or covered by hygroscopic salts, NH $ adsorption to leaf surfaces may substantially increase the NH $ flux to the plant canopy (Erisman & Wyers, 1993 ;Burkhardt & Eiden, 1994 ;Sutton et al, 1995). Controlled-chamber studies with Phaseolus vulgaris (van Hove et al, 1987(van Hove et al, , 1989, Populus euamericana (van Hove et al, 1991), H. vulgare (Husted & Schjoerring, 1995a) and Brassica napus revealed that NH $ uptake through the cuticle was indeed negligible. Dueck et al (1991) measured foliar NH $ uptake of Deschampsia flexuosa and Calluna vulgaris by supplying "&NH $ and did not observe significant "&NH $ uptake through the leaf cuticle.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%