2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2014.08.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the variation in nanohardness of pearlitic steel: Influence of the interplay between ferrite crystal orientation and cementite morphology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The strength of pearlite rail steel can be improved to near 1300 MPa by chemical composition optimization and heat treatment [1][2][3]. This value is close to its upper limit in strength and the toughness of pearlite rail significantly decreases with the increase in strength.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strength of pearlite rail steel can be improved to near 1300 MPa by chemical composition optimization and heat treatment [1][2][3]. This value is close to its upper limit in strength and the toughness of pearlite rail significantly decreases with the increase in strength.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changes in ILS of pearlite and the misorientation angles along and across the ferrite lamellae show significant through-diameter variations at the drawing strain larger than 1.5 [17]. The hardness in different nodules of pearlite (a volume with the same or a similar ferrite crystal orientation) are significantly different, suggesting the ferrite crystal orientation has a great influence on hardness [18]. Besides, the kernel average misorientation (KAM) is a parameter calculated to assess the distribution of local plastic strain as well as dislocation density.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…[ 19 ] Debehets et al investigated the effect of relative orientations of ferrite crystals and Fe 3 C lamellae on the hardness of pearlitic steel by using electron backscattered diffraction (EBSD), nanoindentation, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). [ 20 ]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[19] Debehets et al investigated the effect of relative orientations of ferrite crystals and Fe 3 C lamellae on the hardness of pearlitic steel by using electron backscattered diffraction (EBSD), nanoindentation, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). [20] In this study, the 2D RVE FE model developed for high-carbon steels to estimate the elastic and elastoplastic behavior from real ferrite-cementite-based field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM) micrograph has two major characteristics. First, the values of all the model parameters like elastic modulus and Poisson's ratio, strength coefficient and strain hardening exponent, applied boundary conditions (BCs), etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%