Analysis of unsymmetrical reinforced concrete double corbels

Abdul-Razzaq, Khattab Saleem; Dawood, A. A.; Jalil, Ali Mustafa

doi:10.1063/5.0000051

Cited by 12 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Strut and tie modeling (STM) is considered one of the most influential approaches to analyze RC deep beams where D regions occur [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. The STM approach assumes a truss that contains compression members (struts) that are linked to tensile members (ties) in specific points (nodes) [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Previous Research Works on Reinforced Concrete Curved Beams

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The current research work summarizes some previous research works on horizontally curved beams. Because of curvature, torsional effects in the analysis and design should be included. Diameter of ring beam, number of supports, beam width, compressive strength of the concrete, and bearing plate width. Which can be summarized from previous studies is that increasing diameter of ring by about 25-75% decreases the capacity load by about 14-36%, while increasing number of supports by about 33-100%, beam width by about 25-75%, compressive strength of concrete by about 24-76%, and bearing plate width by about 25-75% increases the capacity load by about 62-189%, 25-75%, 24-76%, and 5-16%, respectively due to the beam section increase and/or its properties. Frequently, reinforced concrete deep ring beams exhibit shear failure in a manner similar to straight beams. Strut and tie model (STM) and plastic analysis are useful tools for efficiently analyzing ring or curved deep beams. In addition, the nonlinear three-dimensional finite element modeling is typical for predicting the deep curved beams strength and behavior.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Previous Research Works on Reinforced Concrete Curved Beams

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…; and (b) The depth of member (h) is not more than four times the clear span''. However, the majority of existing research into the behavior of structure and deep members' strength has been limited to deep beams of single span [3][4][5][6][7] and continuous deep beams [8][9][10][11][12][13], pile caps [14][15], corbels [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] but not take care on ring deep beams.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Finite Element Parametric Study of Reinforced Concrete Horizontally Circular Deep Beams

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A parametric study of twenty-five reinforced concrete ring deep beams using finite element analysis is presented in this study. This paper took into account the kind of loading (partial and complete), the diameter, depth, and width of the ring beam, as well as the NO. of supports. When compared to equivalent concentrated central loading, acting a central partial distributed loading of 25-100 percent of the length of span increased capacity of load by about 3-80 percent while decreasing max. deflection and moments of torsion by about 4-14 percent and 1-9 percent, respectively. Decreases in load capacity of about 10-33 percent were observed when beam diameter was increased by 20-80%, while deflection and moments of torsion increased by about 30-145 percent and 8-23 percent, respectively. When the depth of the beam was increased by 12-50 percent, the capacity of load and moments of torsion increased by about 15-61 percent, while deflection reduced by about 8-21 percent. When the circular beam width was increased by 40-160 percent, the capacity of load, deflection, and moments of torsion increased by about 142-690 percent, 26-62 percent, and 137-662 percent, respectively. Finally, when the NO. of supports increased by 25-150 percent, the capacity of load increased by about 70-380 percent, while the deflection and moments of torsion decreased by about 27-71 percent and 16-72 percent, respectively.

show abstract